Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The General Manager vs N.Rajkumar
2023 Latest Caselaw 15199 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15199 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2023

Madras High Court

The General Manager vs N.Rajkumar on 29 November, 2023

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                                                   W.A.(MD)No.982 of 2018


                            BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED : 29.11.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                         AND
                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                              W.A.(MD)No.982 of 2022
                                                       and
                                             C.M.P.(MD)No.7903 of 2022

                The General Manager,
                Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited,
                Kagithapuram, Karur,
                Karur District.                                                 ... Appellant
                                                    Vs.

                1.N.Rajkumar

                2.Umesh Shipping Services Private Ltd.,
                  Rep., By Director,
                  N.Rajkumar,
                  S/o.K.Nambiraj,
                  No.79, Bryant Nagar,
                  12th Street, Tuticorin-8.

                3.The Inspector of Police,
                  SIPCOT Police Station,
                  Tuticorin.                                              ...Respondents

                PRAYER:           Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters patent, against the order
                dated 20.07.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.12073 of 2012.

                1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                          W.A.(MD)No.982 of 2018




                                           For Appellant      : Mr.ARL.Sundaresan
                                                                Senior Counsel
                                                                for Mr.M.P.Senthil
                                           For R1 & R2        : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan

                                           For R3             : Mr.Veeranthiran
                                                                 Government Advocate



                                                           JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.)

Two contracts had been entered into by the appellant. The first contract

was with an entity by name M/s.R.Flower. The purpose of the contract was to

store imported bleached hard wood sulphate pulp in the godown belonging to the

said entity. Unfortunately, there occurred a theft by which out of 20,803 pulps,

420 pulps went missing. The reason that has been given is that the theft had

occurred in the said godown, which obviously is beyond the control of R.Flower.

2.The appellant also entered into an agreement with one M/s.Umesh

Shipping Services, which was represented by its Director N.Rajkumar. It is

pertinent to point out that M/s.R.Flower belongs to the wife of N.Rajkumar. For

the loss, which had occasioned to an extent of 420 pulps, Tamil Nadu Newsprint

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

and Papers Limited (in short 'TNPL) decided to withhold the amount of Rs.

29,36,011/- from the payments payable to M/s.Umesh Shipping Services Pvt.Ltd.,

by the minutes of the meeting dated 24.08.2012. It was agreed by N.Rajkumar

that the loss, which occasioned in M/s.R.Flower's godown was due to the theft and

for that loss, the appellant can recover the same from the pending bills of

M/s.Umesh Shipping Services Private Ltd., which is a sister concern of

M/s.R.Flower. In the minutes, it is also recorded that N.Rajkumar had requested

TNPL for return of the amount, which had been withheld, in case if he is able to

replace the material equivalent in quantity and quality of the above shortfall

material.

3.After having agreed to the said minutes of the meeting, the writ

petition came to be filed before this Court in W.P.(MD)No.12073 of 2012

challenging the minutes. The prayer in the writ petition was for a writ of

certiorari to quash the minutes dated 24.08.2012 and to direct the release of the

aforesaid amount of Rs.29,36,011/-.

4.The learned Single Judge held that M/s.R.Flower and M/s.Umesh

Shipping Services Private Limited are different entities. He went on to hold that

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the loss caused to the appellant due to the theft in M/s.R.Flower cannot be

recovered from M/s.Umesh Shipping Services Private Limited and consequently,

quashed the minutes of meeting and allowed the writ petition. Challenging the

same, the present writ appeal has been filed.

5.We have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

perused the materials placed on record.

6.The parties reiterated their contentions as stated before the learned

Single Judge. The point to be considered in this appeal is whether the writ petition

challenging the minutes of the meeting and seeking recovery of money is

maintainable.

7.The aforesaid facts are not disputed. There are two separate contracts.

One contract is with M/s.R.Flower and another contract is with M/s.Umesh

Shipping Services Private Limited. The loss was not due to the act of

M/s.R.Flower, but due to the act of theft. N.Rajkumar had agreed to the minutes

of the meeting dated 24.08.2012 to adjust the loss with the pending bills of

M/s.Umesh Shipping Services Private Limited.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

8.The learned Counsel for the first and second respondents submitted

that the minutes of the meeting was vitiated due to the fact that there was an undue

influence, by which N.Rajkumar agreed to the minutes of the meeting. He further

submitted that the parties have two separate entities. TNPL cannot withheld the

amount, which is due from one entity as against the another.

9.We remind that the civil Courts in this country are still functioning and

remedy for recovery of money is only to present the suit before the Civil Court.

Writ petition for the purpose of recovery of money is not maintainable. We hasten

to add that in case of undisputed amounts, a writ petition would be maintainable.

However, these are the exceptional circumstances. We feel that the present writ

petition is not maintainable, especially since N.Rajkumar had agreed that he had

signed the minutes of meeting dated 24.08.2012. Having agreed to the minutes of

the meeting, the question as to whether it is due to vitiating circumstances or not

are the matter, which require evidence. A writ petition is not a substitute for the

suit of recovery of money, especially when the facts are disputed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

10.In light of the above, the writ appeal succeeds and the writ petition

stands dismissed. Liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to file a civil suit. The

time taken from September 2012, that is the date on which the writ petition was

filed, till date stands excluded for the purpose of computing the period of

limitation. In a properly instituted civil suit, all defences can be raised by the

respective parties. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.





                                                                    (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)
                                                                               29.11.2023

                NCC      : Yes / No
                Index : Yes / No
                Internet : Yes / No

                ta


                To

                The Inspector of Police,
                 SIPCOT Police Station,
                 Tuticorin.







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                      S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
                                                            AND
                                  V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
                                                                 ta









                                                    29.11.2023







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter