Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Justin David Salamon Amalraj vs Ganesan
2023 Latest Caselaw 14565 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14565 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 November, 2023

Madras High Court

Justin David Salamon Amalraj vs Ganesan on 22 November, 2023

Author: G.Ilangovan

Bench: G.Ilangovan

                                                                               Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17467 of 2023

                             BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED: 22.11.2023

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

                                             Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17467 of 2023
                                           and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.13880 of 2023

                 Justin David Salamon Amalraj                          ...Petitioner/Accused
                                                          Vs.
                 Ganesan                                               ...Respondent/Complainant

                 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call

                 for the records and set aside the docket order made in C.C.No.158 of 2020 on the

                 file of the Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi, dated 12.09.2023.

                                  For Petitioner    :Mr.D.Venkatesh
                                  For Respondent    :No Appearance

                                                         ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed to set aside the docket order

made in C.C.No.158 of 2020 on the file of the Fast Track Court (Magisterial

Level), Karaikudi, dated 12.09.2023.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17467 of 2023

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that he himself examined as DW1

before the trial Court on 12.05.2023. Later, it was posted for cross examination.

Finally, it was posted on 23.06.2023 for cross examination on the side of the

complainant. Later it could not be done. So, it was adjourned periodically.

Because of the absence or failure on the part of the defence, cross examination of

this petitioner was ordered to be closed on 03.07.2023. Later, he filed application

seeking recall of this petitioner for cross examination that was also allowed. Later

got adjourned on various dates. Finally on 12.09.2023, it was posted for cross

examination. On that date, both this petitioner as well as the complainant

remained absent. On that behind applications were filed. Application filed by the

complainant was allowed, whereas, the application filed by this petitioner was

dismissed. So the cross examination was ordered to closed. Chief examination of

this petitioner was also scrapped. Challenging the above said order, this petition

has been filed.

3.This Court is not in position to understand the proceedings that has been

taken by the trial Court. On the date of cross examination, both sides remained

absent. It ought to have adjourned the matter and directed the complainant to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17467 of 2023

cross examine the petitioner. Without resorting such proceedings, they scrapped

the chief examination, which is not legal. There is no question of scrapping chief

examination. On the sole ground itself, this Court is inclined to set aside the

docket order dated 12.09.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast

Track Court (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi, in C.C.No.158 of 2020.

4.Accordingly, the docket order dated 12.09.2023 passed by the learned

Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi, in C.C.No.

158 of 2020, is hereby set aside. Both parties must appear before the trial Court

on 22.12.2023 without fail. On that date, the complainant must cross examine the

petitioner. The petitioner must present before the Court on that day. If any failure

is noticed, then the judgment shall be pronounced by the trial Court on the basis

of the records available. If the petitioner wants to examine further witnesses, he

may be permitted by the trial Court in this regard, without being influenced by the

observations made by this Court in this matter.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17467 of 2023

5.With the above said directions, this criminal original petition stands

disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

                 Speaking             : Yes / No                                 22.11.2023
                 NCC                  : Yes / No
                 Internet             : Yes / No
                 Index                : Yes / No

                 TM

                 Note: Issue order copy on 27.11.2023.

                 To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level), Karaikudi.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.17467 of 2023

G.ILANGOVAN. J.

TM

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17467 of 2023

22.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter