Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3528 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2023
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011 & MP.Nos.1/2012 & 1/2013
1.N.V.Venkatesan
2.N.S.Ramgopal
3.Murali Rajagopalan .. Appellants
in both Appeals
Vs.
1.N.D.N.Parthasarathy [Deceased]
2.N.Sampath
3.N.Rajagopalan
4.D.Sundararajan
5.Preeth Parthasarathy
6.D.Senthil Kumar
7.S.Krishnamoorthy
8.V.V.Nagarajan
9.K.Velmurugan
10.M.Manoharan
11.Tmt.Mythili Sundar
12.Radha Parthasarathy
13.Priya Ramakrishnan .. Respondents
in AS.No.333/2011
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
**RR2&3 brought on record as LRs of deceased 1st respondent viz., N.D.N.Parthasarathy vide Court order dated 17.10.2022 made in CMP.No.7369, 7371 & 7374/2021 in AS.Nos.334 & 333/2011
1.N.D.N.Parthasarathy
2.Mrs.Vasumathichari
3.Mrs.Radha Balaji
4.Mr.Sundararajan
5.Mrs.Chitra Sridharan
6.Mrs.Rama Sampath
7.Mrs.Malathi
8.Mrs.Mythili Sundar
9.Radha Parthasarathy
10.Priya Ramakrishnan
11.Preeth Parthasarathy .. Respondents in AS.No.334/2011
Common Prayer:- Appeal Suits filed under Section 96 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2011 made in OS.No.713/2004 & 369/2006 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.
AS.No.333/2011:-
For Appellants : Mr.R.Agilesh For RR 2 to 4, 6 to 11 : No appearance For R5 : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For R12 : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For R13 : Mr.C.Edsar Raj for M/s.Chennai Law Firm
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
AS.No.334/2011:-
For Appellants : Mr.R.Agilesh For RR 2 to 8 : No appearance For R5 : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For R9 : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For R10 : Mr.C.Edsar Raj for M/s.Chennai Law Firm For R11 : Mr.S.Kalyanaraman
COMMON JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,]
(1) Today, a Memo dated 23.03.2023 is filed by the learned counsel
appearing for the appellants, on behalf of the appellants.
(2) It is stated in the Memo that the parties had settled their dispute in
the above First Appeals and the appellants have decided to
withdraw the Appeal Suits. Learned counsel also referred to the
letter dated 22.03.2023 addressed by the appellants to the learned
counsel, based on which a letter has been sent by the learned
counsel to the Registry requesting to post the above Appeal Suits
for withdrawal.
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
(3) Learned counsel also made a submission that recording the Memo
dated 23.03.2023, the Appeal Suits may be dismissed as
withdrawn.
(4) Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants
and the Memo dated 23.03.2023 filed on behalf of the appellants,
these Appeal Suits are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[SSSRJ] [PBBJ]
30.03.2023
AP
Internet : Yes
To
1.The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore.
2.The Section Officer VR Section, High Court, Chennai.
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
S.S.SUNDAR, J., AND P.B.BALAJI, J.,
AP
AS.Nos.333 & 334/2011
30.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 5
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!