Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3439 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.3.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
R.Vibushanan ... Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1. The District Collector,
Tiruvallur District,
Tiruvallur.
2. The District Revenue Officer,
Tiruvallur District,
Tiruvallur. ... Respondents/Respondents
Writ Appeal filed under Section 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the
order passed in W.P.No.16817 of 2019 dated 4.09.2019 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanaban
For Respondents : Mr.P.Anandakumar
*****
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)
The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition challenging the
impugned order dated 20.12.2010 of the second respondent suspending the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
petitioner with effect from 16.12.2010 on account of his having involved in
Crime No.3/AC/2010/CC-III dated 16.12.2010 of the Vigilance and Anti-
Corruption under Sec.7 of Prevention of Corruption Act and consequently,
direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as an Assistant in any non
sensitive post in the Revenue Department. The prayer as sought for in the writ
petition was rejected by the Writ Court. Aggrieved by the same, the writ
petitioner has filed the instant appeal before this Court.
2. A trap case was registered as against the appellant and charge
sheet was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate cum Special Judge,
Thiruvallur and the same was taken on file on 14.3.2012 in Spl.C.C.No.8 of
2012. By judgment dated 16.3.2023, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate cum
Special Judge, Thiruvallur has convicted the appellant and imposed a
punishment of 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.20,000/- for the
offences under Sec.7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 in default 3
months simple imprisonment and 4 years rigorous imprisonment and fined
Rs.20,000/- in default 3 months simple imprisonment for the offences under
Sec.13(1) (d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and ordered
sentences may run concurrently. According to the respondent, in the light of
adverse judgment rendered as against the appellant/petitioner, appropriate
action will be initiated as against the appellant/petitioner.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
3. In the light of adverse judgment rendered as against the
petitioner cited supra, the writ appeal is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly,
the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs. However, it is always open to the
appellant to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority as against the said
judgment. Liberty is granted to the appellant to approach the authorities
concerned for payment of subsistence allowance, if not already paid.
(D.K.K.J. ) (K.G.T.J.)
29.3.2023
Speaking/Non Speaking order
Index: Yes
vaan
To
1. The District Collector, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.
2. The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.
W.A.No.4177 of 2019
Dated: 29.3.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!