Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kavitha vs Nambirajan ... 1St
2023 Latest Caselaw 3408 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3408 Mad
Judgement Date : 29 March, 2023

Madras High Court
Kavitha vs Nambirajan ... 1St on 29 March, 2023
                                                                               C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                   DATED : 29.03.2023

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                               C.M.A(MD)No.1481 of 2013
                                                         and
                                                 M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013

                     1. Kavitha
                     2. Ramaraj Udayar                     ..... Appellants/ Respondents 1 and 2
                                                                   / Defendants 1 and 2
                                                            -vs-

                     1. Nambirajan                           ... 1st Respondent/Appellant/ Plaintiff
                     2. Rengaraj                             .... 2nd Respondent/ 3rd Respondent/
                                                                                      3rd Defendant
                        ( The 2nd respondent is given up, since
                         he is ex-parte in the Courts-below)

                     PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Order 41 Rule 1 of C.P.C,
                     to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2013 passed in A.S.No.77 of
                     2012 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai, setting aside
                     the judgment and decree, dated 30.10.2010 passed in O.S.No.234 of 2007, on
                     the file of the learned District Munsif, Pudukkottai, remanding the suit to trial
                     Court.


                                         For Appellants      : Mr.K.Balasundaran
                                                               Senior Counsel


                     1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013


                                             For Respondents : Mr. N.Tamil Mani
                                                               for R-1

                                                              : R2 – given up vide EB


                                                       JUDGMENT

The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the

defendants 1 and 2 in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction

challenging the order of remand passed by the first appellate Court.

2. The plaintiff had filed O.S.No.234 of 2007 for the relief of

declaration of title and permanent injunction with regard to two items of

property. The Trial Court, after considering the oral and documentary

evidence, had dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaintiff has not

established his case.

3. The plaintiff had filed A.S.No.77 of 2012 before the Sub Court,

Pudukkottai District, challenging the said judgment and decree. The first

appellate Court, without setting aside anyone of the findings of the trial

Court, had simply passed an order of remand with a finding that both the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013

parties have not made any attempt to establish their case properly before the

trial Court.

4. It is the settled position of law that whenever the first appellate Court

passes an order of remand, all the findings of the trial Court should be set

aside and thereafter, the first appellate Court should arrive at a finding that

the oral and documentary evidence that is available before the first appellate

Court is not sufficient to arrive at any conclusion. However, such a

conclusion has not been arrived at by the first appellate Court. Without setting

aside anyone of the findings of the trial Court and without arriving at any

findings relating to the sufficiency of the oral and documentary evidence, the

first appellate Court has simply passed an order of remand. Therefore, order

of remand is not in accordance with under Order 41 Rule 23 C.P.C. The order

of remand is liable to be set aside.

5. The learned counsel appearing on either side submit that in the order

of remand, the trial Court has appointed an Advocate Commissioner and he

has also submitted a report.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013

6. In view of the above said facts, the order of remand is invalid in the

eye of law and any oral and documentary evidence or Commissioner's report

that were undertaken before the trial Court will not have any validity. The

matter is remitted back to the first appellate Court to consider the matter

afresh on merits and in accordance with law, based on the oral and

documentary evidence which are already on record.

7. With the above said observations, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is

allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected

Miscellaneous Petition is closed.



                                                                                                29.03.2023
                     NCC      : Yes/No
                     Index    : Yes / No
                     Internet : Yes / No
                     ebsi





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                              C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013




                     To
                     1. The Subordinate Court,
                       Pudukkottai.

                     2.The District Munsif Court,
                       Pudukkottai

                     3. The Section Officer,
                        Vernacular Records,
                        Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
                        Madurai.





https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                       C.M.A.(MD).No.1481 of 2013




                                       R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

                                                            ebsi




                                  C.M.A.(MD)No.1481 of 2013




                                                    29.03.2023




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter