Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Subramani vs K.Sivakumar
2023 Latest Caselaw 2097 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2097 Mad
Judgement Date : 8 March, 2023

Madras High Court
M.Subramani vs K.Sivakumar on 8 March, 2023
                                                                                      Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED :08.03.2023

                                                          CORAM

                             THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

                                                 Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020

                    M.Subramani                                                .. Petitioner

                                                           /versus/

                    K.Sivakumar                                                .. Respondent

                    Prayer : Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Section 397 and
                    401 of Cr.P.c., praying to call for the records in C.A.No.104 of 2017 on
                    the file of the Sessions Judge of the Nilgiris at Udhagamandalam dated
                    04.03.2019 confirming the order of the conviction passed by the learned
                    Judicial Magistrate Court, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris District in
                    S.T.C.No.162 of 2010, dated 07.03.2017 set aside the conviction of 6
                    months Simple Imprisonment and also to pay compensation of
                    Rs.2,00,000/- in default of payment, further conviction of one month
                    Simple Imprisonment and set the petitioner at liberty .


                                     For Petitioner       :No appearance

                                     For Respondent       :Mrs.M.Reena for
                                                           Mr.J.Bharathiraja




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                    1/5
                                                                               Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020




                                                       ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case preferred by the accused, aggrieved by

the concurrent finding of the Courts below holding him guilty of offence

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for issuing a

cheque of Rs.2,00,000/- to discharge the liability. Knowing well that he

has no sufficient amount to honour the cheque. The trial Court held the

revision petitioner guilty and sentenced him to undergo six months SI and

pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default in payment of

compensation, one month SI. Aggrieved by that, the accused preferred an

appeal before the Sessions Court, The Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam in

Crl.A.No.104 of 2017 and the lower appellate Court has dismissed the

appeal on 04.03.2019 by confirming the judgment of the trial Court in

S.T.C.No.162 of 2010 dated 07.03.2017.

2. Challenging the concurrent finding of the Courts below, this

Criminal Revision Case has been filed along with the petition for

suspension of sentence. When it was came up for admission, this Court on

20.02.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.676 of 2020 suspended the sentence on

condition that the petitioner/accused shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020

within a period of six weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of that

order.

3. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the

learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the conditional

order was not complied and further, the revision petitioner/accused died,

but she is not aware of the date of his demise. In any event, on perusal of

the records, this Court finds that the revision petitioner/accused, who was

granted suspension of sentence on a specific condition that he should

deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- within a period of six weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of that order, has not complied the said condition.

4. As far as the grounds of the revision is concerned, the contention

of the revision petitioner/accused that he has no privity of contract with

the complainant and he does not know that the complainant at all has been

disbelieved by both the Courts below. For the reason that, on receipt of

the statutory notice, the accused has not replied to deny the privity of

contract and further more, having admitted the signature in the cheque but

taking a defence that the cheque was not given to the complainant but to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020

one Govindaraj, who had financial transaction, does not pass the test of

preponderance of probability to rebut the presumption under Section 139

of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The reasoning given by the

Courts below does not suffer infirmity or illegality to interfere exercising

the power under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. For that reason, the Criminal

Revision case is liable to be dismissed.

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

08.03.2023 Index:yes/no Speaking order/non speaking order ari

To:

1.The District & Sessions Judge, The Nilgiris at Udhagamandalam.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Udhagamandalam.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

ari

Crl.R.C.No.108 of 2020

08.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter