Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1913 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2023
CMA.No.2622 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.M.A No.2622 of 2013
and
M.P No.1 of 2013
Jegabar Nachiar ... Appellant
vs.
1.Mohidheen Abdul Qadir
2.Amma Sabu
3.Ahamed Jalaludheen
4.Mohammed Modheen
5.Nafeesa Ammal
6.Syed Yusuf ... Respondents
Prayer:- The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Order XLIII
Rule 1 (U) of Civil Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment
passed in A.S No.70 of 2011 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge,
Nagapattinam dated 28.09.2012 reversing the decreetal order and order
passed in I.A No.219 of 2008 in O.S No.61 of 2004 on the file of the
learned District Munsif, Nagapattinam dated 10.01.2011.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Raghupathi
For Respondents : Mr.S.M.Hameed Mohideen for R1
R2, R3 & R6 - Given up
R4 & R5 - Died
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMA.No.2622 of 2013
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/4th defendant challenging
the judgment and decree passed in A.S No.70 of 2011 by the learned
Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam dated 28.09.2012 reversing the decreetal
order and order passed in I.A No.219 of 2008 in O.S No.61 of 2004 on the
file of the learned District Munsif, Nagapattinam dated 10.01.2011.
2. When the matter was taken up today, the learned counsel for the
appellant and the 1st respondent submitted that the matter has been settled
between the parties. Pursuant to the same, the appellant has filed a Memo
dated 30.11.2022 which reads as follows:
'It is submitted that a compromise has been arrived at between the Appellant and contesting First Respondent. Two Respondents Nos.4 and 5 namely Mohammed Mohideen and Nafeesa Ammal respectively died and their legal heirs are not necessary parties and they are given up in this Appeal.
namely Amma Sabu, Ahamed Jalaludeen and Syed Yusuf respectively are given up in this Appeal. The only contesting 1st respondent accepts that the appellant is
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.2622 of 2013
owner of the suit property which is the subject matter of this CMA. The contesting 1st respondent has also no objection for allowing the above CMA without costs against the 1st respondent alone. The 1st respondent has also filed a memo to that effect.
3. The 1st respondent/1st Plaintiff has also filed a Memo dated
dated 24.11.2022 stating that he has no objection to allow this appeal and
the same is extracted hereunder:
It is respectfully submitted that the first respondent above named prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to allow the above CMA as far as I am concerned in the interest of justice".
4. Recording the aforesaid memos filed by both the parties, this Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed and the same shall form part of the
decree. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is
closed.
06.03.2023
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking Order:Yes/No uma
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMA.No.2622 of 2013
A.A.NAKKIRAN,J.
uma
CMA No.2622 of 2013 and M.P No.1 of 2013
06.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!