Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1856 Mad
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2023
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022
in CRP(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 03.03.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022
in
C.R.P(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022
M.Chandrasekhar .. Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
1.M.K.Srinivasan
2.M.S.Jeevarekha
3.M.S.Giridharan
4.M.S.Sakthinivasan
5.R.Ramasamy
6.N.Palanisamy
7.P.Vijaya Baskar
8.P.Devi
9.K.Rengasamy
10.Pappathi
11.K.Subbulakshmi
12.R.Sellammal
13.V.Ramasamy
14.R.Karunanithi
15.R.Ramesh
16.Senthilkumar
17.Prakash
18.R.Suresh .. Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER : Revision Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, to grant leave to the petitioner to file the above civil
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022
in CRP(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
revision petition challenging the proceedings in E.P.No.49 of 2022 in
O.S.No.6 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur.
C.R.P(MD).SR.No.12284 of 2022
M.Chandrasekhar ... Petitioner/Third Party/Third Party
Vs.,
1.M.K.Srinivasan
2.M.S.Jeevarekha
3.M.S.Giridharan
4.M.S.Sakthinivasan ... Respondents 1 to 4/Petitioners/Decree
-holder/Plaintiffs
5.R.Ramasamy
6.N.Palanisamy
7.P.Vijaya Baskar
8.P.Devi
9.K.Rengasamy
10.Pappathi
11.K.Subbulakshmi
12.R.Sellammal
13.V.Ramasamy
14.R.Karunanithi
15.R.Ramesh
16.Senthilkumar
17.Prakash
18.R.Suresh .. Respondents 5 to 18
/Respondents/Judgment debtors/defendants
PRAYER: Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, to strike off the petition in E.P.No.49 of 2022 in O.S.No.6 of
2011 on the file of the learned District Judge, Karur.
In both
For Petitioner : Mrs.J.Anandhavalli
For Respondents : Mr.P.Samuvel Gunasingh (for R1 to R4)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/5
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022
in CRP(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
ORDER
The present revision has been filed by a third party to the
execution proceedings seeking to quash the execution proceedings with
an application to grant leave of this Court to file the civil revision
petition.
2. Now, the learned counsel appearing for the revision
petitioner points out that the present revision petitioner has already filed
an application under Order 21 Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure
before the Executing Court. The revision petitioner is permitted to raise
all the pleas before the said Court.
2. Granting such liberty, the application seeking leave to file
civil revision petition is closed, as no further orders are called for in the
revision. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is rejected at the SR
stage itself. No costs.
03.03.2023
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Rmk
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022 in CRP(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
To
1.The District Judge, Karur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022 in CRP(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.,
Rmk
Order made in C.M.P(MD).No.12284 of 2022 in C.R.P(MD).SR.No.76870 of 2022
Dated:
03.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!