Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1783 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2023
CRP(MD).No.544 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 02.03.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
CRP(MD).No. 544 of 2023
and
C.M.P(MD).No.2594 of 2023
Kalavathi .. Petitioners/Appellant/Petitioner
Vs.
1.Minor Balaji
rep., by his next friend & Guardianship
Vijayagowri
2.T.Subramani
3.Vellaisamy .. Respondents1 to 3/Respondents1
to3/Defendants 1 to 3
4.V.Pandiyaraj ... 4th Respondent/4th Respondent/
Proposed party
PRAYER : Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 20.12.2022 made
in I.A.No.3 of 2021 in A.S.No.17 of 2017 passed by the learned
Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.
. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Sivabalan
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
CRP(MD).No.544 of 2023
ORDER
The second defendant in a suit for partition is the revision
petitioner.
2. The suit for partition in O.S.No.209 of 2009 was decreed by
the trial Court on 09.01.2017. Challenging the same, the second
defendant, namely Kalavathi, had filed a first appeal in A.S.No.17 of
2017 before the Subordinate Court, Uthamapalayam. While the appeal
was pending for four years, I.A.No.3 of 2021 was filed by the appellant
to implead her husband as the second appellant in the appeal. The said
application was dismissed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the
present Revision Petition has been filed.
3. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the impleading
application indicates that the second defendant had executed a registered
settlement deed in favour of her husband on 21.12.2016, when the trial
Court had posted the case for judgment. Based upon the said settlement
deed, the second defendant now seeks to implead her husband as the
second appellant in the appeal. Therefore, it is clear that the proposed
parties is a pendentilite purchaser when the suit was posted for judgment
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD).No.544 of 2023
by the trial Court. Therefore, being a pendentilite purchaser, who was
aware of the suit, is not entitled to be impleaded in the suit. Therefore, I
do not file any infirmity in the order passed by the trial Court.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
02.03.2023
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
Rmk
To
The Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, Theni District.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD).No.544 of 2023
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.,
Rmk
Order made in CRP(MD).No.544 of 2023
Dated:
02.03.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!