Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Mukanchand Bothra(Died) vs The Inspector Of Police
2023 Latest Caselaw 1717 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1717 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 March, 2023

Madras High Court
S.Mukanchand Bothra(Died) vs The Inspector Of Police on 2 March, 2023
                                                                                   Crl.OP.No.28483 of
                                                                                                2015

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     DATED : 02.03.2023

                                                          CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                Crl.O.P.No.28483 of 2015

                     1.S.Mukanchand Bothra(died)
                     2. M. Sandeep Bothra                                      ... Petitioners

                                                            Vs.

                     1. The Inspector of Police,
                        W-10 Flower Bazaar Police Station,
                       Chennai – 600 001.
                     2.Meena @ Meenakshi
                     (Impleaded as per orders dated 17.08.2022 in Crl.M.P.No.11388 of 2022 in
                     Crl.O.P No. 28483 of 2015.)
                                                                       ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,

                     pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the charge sheet in C.C

                     No.2994 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned III Metropolitan

                     Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and to quash the same.

                                    For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Gagan Bothra, (Party in person)
                                    For R1               : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam
                                                          Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
                                    For R2              : Ms.Jayashree Dharbar.



                     1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                           Crl.OP.No.28483 of
                                                                                                        2015




                                                             ORDER

This petition has been filed to to call for the entire records pertaining

to the charge sheet in C.C No.2994 of 2013 pending on the file of the

learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and to quash

the same.

2. On 01.11.2022, the petitioner voluntarily came forward to donate a

sum of Rs. 7.5 lakhs to the credit of The Madras Advocate's Co-operative

Society, to show his bonafide that he and his family members have always

contributed for the benevolent cause of the public and this Court also post

the matter on 10.11.2022 for reporting compliance. Thereafter on

25.01.2023 the petitioner prayed to reduce the amount from 7.5 lakhs to 5

lakhs, after considering his submission this Court reduced the amount to 5

lakhs and directed to pay the said amount on or before next hearing.

Thereafter, on 27.02.2023, the petitioner submitted that he want to

withdraw the matter and ready to face the Trial.

3. The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that

complaint was given in the year 2013 and all these years the petitioner drag

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.28483 of

on the proceedings.

4. On perusal of the records, it reveals that from the year 2015 there is

no progress in this case. Further the petitioner voluntarily inclined to donate

a sum of Rs. 7.5 lakhs, thereafter he refused to pay a said amount. Last

occasion this Court asked the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the

legal service authority, for that the petitioner also agreed to pay a sum of

Rs.10,000/- in cash accordingly, the matter was taken up today, the

petitioner raised allegation against the second respondent counsel and not

ready to pay the said amount

5. On seeing the conduct of the petitioner, he is not inclined to obey

the order of this Court as assured earlier. On perusal of the records petitioner

neither accused in crime number but he appeared on behalf his brother

based on power of attorney given by his brother. But the accused are his

brother and father, now his father was passed away. On perusal of the

records in Crl.M.P No. 11390 of 2022 he was permitted to appear on behalf

of his brother based on the power of attorney given by his brother. The

power of attorney filed by the petitioner are as follows:

i. To instruct advocates to issue notice to my trade debtors, rejoinders to reply notice etc., ii. To instruct advocate to prepare suits, complaints, affidavits

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.28483 of

counter statements, memorandum of grounds, sign vakalats etc., iii. To file or represent criminal complaints, petitions, plaints, rejoinders counter etc on my behalf iv. To take adjourments, to file proff affidavits and sign the same. v. To appear, plead and argue both in civil and criminal matters. vi. To appear, contest complaints, petitions, appeals, M.P's in all te Courts which includes Hon'ble High Court, Supreme Court, Magistrate Courts etc all over India., vii. To apply certified copies of any documents in any Court's and to obtain the same.

Viii. To appear, plead and argue before this Hon'ble Court to conduct my case on my behalf ix. To give evidence, to mark my documents, to argue the case, to receive any documents, copies, and judgments pronounced and I authorize him to do the above acts which and just and necessary.

X. I hereby agree to ratify all acts, deeds and things done and executed and performed by my power aged by virtue of this deed of power of attorney.

6. So far, he has not engaged counsel on behalf of his brother. He is

not an advocate, all these years, he dragged on the proceedings. Moreover,

he is not a person of keeping words, nor he maintained decorum in the Court

hall always throwing allegations and causing hindrance in the court

proceedings. Furthermore as per the terms of the power of attorney he is not

yet engaged counsel on behalf of his brother. Considering the above contact

of the petitioner the order in Crl.M.P No. 11390 of 2022 is re-called.

However the petitioner wants to withdraw the case, accordingly this petition

is dismissed as withdrawn. Further the Trial Court is directed to complete

the Trial as expeditiously as possible.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.28483 of

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

pbl

7. Accordingly, this Criminal original petition is dismissed.

02.03.2023 pbl

Crl.OP.No.28483 of 2015

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.28483 of

02.03.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter