Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Srinivasan vs The Commissioner
2023 Latest Caselaw 7197 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7197 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2023

Madras High Court
Srinivasan vs The Commissioner on 28 June, 2023
                                                                                W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                    DATED: 28.06.2023

                                                          CORAM:

                          THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH

                                            W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023
                                                         and
                                                W.M.P.No.16966 of 2023

                     Srinivasan                                       ..Petitioner in W.P.17842/2023

                     Vivek Valsaon                                    ..Petitioner in W.P.17907/2023


                                                               Vs.

                     The Commissioner,
                     Udhagamandalam Municipality,
                     Hospital Road,
                     Upper Bazaar, Ootacamund,
                     The Nilgiris.                                   ..Respondents in both the WPs

                     PRAYER in W.P.No.17842 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article
                     226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of Certiorarified
                     Mandamus          to   call   for   the   records     of     the    proceedings        in
                     Ka.Vi.No.54/2020/F2 dated 14.02.2023, on the file of the respondent and
                     to quash the same as illegal, and without jurisdiction and to consequently
                     direct the respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's building
                     application dated 01.09.2020.




                     ---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.1/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

PRAYER in W.P.No.17907 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to pass orders on the application for building permission bearing No.B.A.No.29/2021/F1 within a time frame fixed by this Court.

                                  For Petitioners    : Mr.K.Sharath Chandran in both WPs

                                  For Respondent     : Mr.P.Srinivas,
                                                       Standing Counsel in both Wps

                                                   *******
                                               COMMON ORDER

The issue involved in the both the writ petitions are common

and hence they are taken up together, heard and disposed of through this

common order.

2. The petitioner in W.P.No.17842 of 2023 has challenged the

proceedings of the respondent in Ka.Vi.No.54/2020/F2 dated 14.02.2023

and has sought for consequential direction to the respondent to pass

orders on the building application submitted by the petitioner on

01.09.2020.

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.2/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

3. The petitioner in W.P.No.17907 of 2023 has approached this

Court seeking for issue of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents

to pass order on the application submitted by the petitioner seeking for

building permission within the time frame fixed by this Court.

4. Heard Mr.K.Sharath Chandran, learned counsel appearing

for the petitioners and Mr.P.Srinivasan, learned Standing Counsel

appearing for the respondent.

5. The learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent/ Municipality sought for time to file counter in these writ

petitions. However, considering the fact that the issue involved in these

writ petitions are squarely covered by the earlier order passed by this

Court in L.Loganathan Vs. Commissioner of Udhagamandalam

Municipality reported in 2020 SCC OnLine Mad 18809 and the

subsequent order passed in B.Nagaraj Vs. The Commissioner of

Udhagamandalam Municipality in W.P.No.6674 of 2020 dated

03.03.2023, it will be an useless formality to wait for counter, since the

stand that was taken by the respondent / Municipality was considered

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

and only thereafter those orders were passed by this Court.

6. The case of the petitioners is that they are the absolute

owners of the subject property and they are claiming their right and title

through registered documents. The petitioners submitted their

applications seeking for building permission before the respondent/

Municipality under the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill Stations)

Building Rules, 1993, for grant of permission to construct a residential

building. Pursuant to the same, the report was also sought for from the

Tahsildar and the Tahsildar has submitted a report to the effect that the

building is within 150 Kms from the reserve forests. In view of the

same, the respondent seems to have come to the conclusion that the

building permission cannot be granted in view of the bar under Section

7(2) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill Stations) Building

Rules, 1993.

7. The very same issue was considered by this Court in the

earlier writ petitions that have been referred supra. In fact, the order

passed in W.P.No.6674 of 2023 had taken into consideration the earlier

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

order passed by this Court and it was held as follows:-

                                            23.   In    L.LOGANATHAN         Vs.     THE
                                  COMMISSIONER,                  UDHAGAMANDALAM

MUNICIPALITY, UDHAGAMANDALAM, NILGIRIS (W.P.No.10262 of 2020), the learned Single Judge of this Court extensively considered the Master Plan and Development Control Rules applicable to the Hill areas and also considering the Rule 7 (2) had directed the authorities to grant permission and the above order has also been complied. The above judgment was passed on 04.09.2020. Despite this Court interpreted and directed the authorities to grant permission, the authorities simply rejected the application citing Rule 7(2). Such act of the officials is certainly take away the rights of the citizens to have a decent living with dignity and to shelter and also it violates fundamental rights.

24. Therefore, considering the above, the rejection citing Rule 7(2) is improper and already a judgment of this Court interpreted the rules in the latest judgment in W.P.No.10262 of 2020 and the said order has been complied and therefore, the same is binding on the authorities, as they are already parties to the above said writ petition and the same is also

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.5/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

binding on the Commissioner, Udhagamandalam Municipality.

25. In such view of the matter, the impugned order is set aside. Respondent is directed to consider the application and grant permission, if it is otherwise in order and also there shall be a direction to the Commissioner of Udagamandalam Municipality not to reject any such application in future merely on the ground of Rule 7 (2), if the application satisfies the other parameters provided in the approved Master Plan.

8. In view of the above, it is quite clear that the respondent

cannot reject the application by quoting Rule 7(2) of the Tamil Nadu

District Municipalities (Hill Stations) Building Rules, 1993 and the

application has to be considered independently without any reference to

Rule 7(2). These writ petitions can also be disposed of in terms of the

above orders referred supra.

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.6/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

9. In the light of the above discussion:

a) W.P.No.17842 of 2023 is allowed and the

impugned proceedings of the respondent in

Ka.Vi.No.54/202/F2 dated 14.02.2023 is hereby set aside.

The respondent is directed to process the application

submitted by the petitioner seeking for building permission

and it shall be considered and permission shall be granted,

if it is otherwise in order without making reference to Rule

7(2) of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill

Stations) Building Rules, 1993. This process shall be

completed by the respondent within a period of four (4)

weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

b) W.P.No.17907 of 2023 is allowed and the

respondent is directed to process the application submitted

by the petitioner seeking for building permission and it

shall be considered and permission shall be granted, if it is

otherwise in order without making reference to Rule 7(2)

of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill Stations)

Building Rules, 1993. This process shall be completed by

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.7/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

the respondent within a period of four (4) weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of the order. No costs.

Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is

closed.



                                                                                          28.06.2023
                     dsa
                     Index             :Yes/No
                     Internet          : Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation  : Yes/No

Speaking order/ Non-speaking order

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.8/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

To:-

The Commissioner, Udhagamandalam Municipality, Hospital Road, Upper Bazaar, Ootacamund, The Nilgiris.

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.9/10 W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.

dsa

W.P.Nos.17842 and 17907 of 2023

28.06.2023

---------------

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.10/10

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter