Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7073 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2023
C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHACHAKRAVARTHY
C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
and
C.M.P.No.7659 of 2022
Anand ... Appellant
Vs.
A.Sivagami ... Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family
Court Act against the order dated 20.01.2022 made in I.A.No.2 of 2021
in H.M.O.P.No.24 of 2017 on the file of Additional principal Family
Curt, Coimbatore.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Gopinath
For Respondent : Ms.G.Keerthana
JUDGMENT
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1/4 C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order of
the Additional Principal Family Court, Coimbatore, dated 20.01.2022 in
I.A.No.2 of 2021 in H.M.O.P.No.24 of 2017, in and by which, the prayer
of the interim maintenance of the respondent/wife was partly allowed
and the appellant was directed to pay a sum of Rs.7,500/- per month and
litigation expenses of Rs.10,000/-.
2. Heard, Mr.T.Gobinath, learned counsel for the appellant and
Ms.G.Keerthana, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that in this case
the respondent/wife was set exparte and after the decree was passed, the
appellant got remarried and he has got three children out of the wedlock.
Therefore, with a meagre income as a commission agent, he finds it
difficult to maintain the second family and that a sum of Rs.7,500/- is on
the higher side and therefore, would pray that the said sum may be
reduced.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit
that when the appellant is working as a commission agent and is earning
adequately, only a sum of Rs.7,500/- was ordered which itself is on the
lower side.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2/4 C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
5. We have considered the submission made on either side and
perused the material records of the case.
6. We find that when the marital relationship is admitted and the
respondent/wife is unable to maintain herself and when the exparte order
is set aside, only a sum Rs.7,500/- per month was ordered as
maintenance. This cannot be a case for further reduction or interference.
However, considering the facts and circumstances, this Civil
Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed, with a direction to the trial Court to
take up the main H.M.O.P.No.24 of 2017 for disposal and dispose of the
same as expeditiously as possible, in any event, not later than three
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no
order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed.
(J.N.B,J.) (D.B.C, J.)
Index : Yes / No 26.06.2023
Internet : Yes
vsi
To
The Family Court,
Erode.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3/4 C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
J. NISHA BANU, J.
and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.
vsi
C.M.A.No.1038 of 2022
26.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4/4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!