Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7051 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2023
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date : 26.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
and
Crl.M.P.(MD)No.10794 of 2018
Pakirathan ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Pappakudi Police Station,
Tirunelveli District. ... Respondent
PRAYER : This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section
397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the judgment
passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Court, Tenkasi dated
02.11.2018 in Crl.A.No.37 of 2016 by modifying the order of conviction
and sentence passed by the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial
Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi in C.C.No.298 of 2008 dated 07.04.2016
and set aside the same as illegal and acquit the petitioner by allowing this
Criminal Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prabu
For Respondent : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi
Government Advocate(Crl.Side)
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/7
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
ORDER
This revision has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the
judgment passed by the learned Additional District Sessions Court,
Tenkasi, dated 02.11.2018 in Crl.A.No.37 of 2016 by modifying the
order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned District Munsif
Cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi in C.C.No.298 of 2008 dated
07.04.2016 and set aside the same as illegal and acquit the petitioner by
allowing this Criminal Revision Petition.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 10.09.2008 at about 05.00
p.m., near by Sivan Kovil, the petitioner/accused drove the Deepa
Matriculation School Bus bearing No.72 M 8436 and dropped the
deceased and further without seeing the deceased, the petitioner started
the vehicle and dashed against the deceased. Thereby, the deceased
sustained injuries and he died. Hence, the complaint was registered
against the petitioner in Crime No.90 of 2008 for the offence punishable
under Section 304(A) of IPC.
3. After taking cognizance by the trial Court, on the side of the
prosecution, 11 witnesses have been examined as P.W.1 to P.W.11 and
seven documents were examined as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.7 and on the side of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
the accused, no one was examined as witnesses and no documents were
marked.
4. On perusal of the oral and documentary evidence, the trial Court
found the petitioner guilty and convicted him for the offence under
Section 304(A) of IPC and sentenced him to undergo one year simple
imprisonment in C.C.No.298 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif
Cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi. Aggrieved by the same, the
petitioner has preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.37 of 2016 before learned
Additional District Sessions Court, Tenkasi, and the same was partly
allowed on 02.11.2018 by modifying the sentence by directing him to
serve three months rigorous imprisonment instead of one year rigorous
imprisonment. Against which, the present revision has been filed.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that non of the
witnesses has spoken about that petitioner has droved the vehicle in a
rash and negligent manner. He further submitted that the deceased is the
pre K.G student and after getting down from the school van. The parents
of the deceased ought to have take the child to home. However, after
getting down from school van, the decased boy without any caution and
without even seeing the school van, the deceased crossed the road and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
the van dashed against the deceased. The deceased sustained grievous
injuries and died. He further submitted that the accident ought not to
have occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the petitioner
herein and the accident was occurred only by the deceased boy, since the
boy without noticing the van, he crossed the road. Hence, he prayed for
acquittal from the charge under Section 305(A) of IPC.
6. The Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondent police submitted that in order to prove the prosecution,
several witnesses were examined and the vehicle's report is marked as
Ex.P7. Without seeing the child while he was crossing the road, after
getting down from the school van to reach his home, the driver of the
vehicle drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and dashed
against the deceased and he sustained serious injuries and died. He
further submitted that both the Courts below held that because of the
carelessness of the petitioner only, the accident was occurred.
7. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
8. On 10.09.2008 at about 05.00 p.m., near by Sivan Kovil, the
petitioner drove the Deepa Matriculation School Bus bearing No.72 M https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
8436 and dropped the deceased in front of his house and the deceased
crossed the road in front of the van without noticing that the van was
proceed forwarded. The child was not visible to the petitioner, while he
start the vehicle to drop the other children. Admittedly, the residence of
the deceased is situated in the opposite side of the road. Therefore, the
deceased after getting down from the van, he ought to have crossed the
road to reach his house. Absoultly, the petitioner is also without noticing
the child he suddenly started the van and proced forwarded. The accident
was not occurred only due to the rash and negligent driving of the
petitioner and also negligence on the part of the deceased child.
Normally after getting down from the school van, the parents are will
take care of their child, since the child was aged about 4 ½ years at the
time of the accident.
9. Considering the said submission, the conviction imposed by the
both Courts below is confirmed. Insofar as the sentence is concerned, it
is modified to effect that the petitioner shall pay compensation of Rs.
50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) before the District Munsif Cum
Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi, in C.C.No.298 of 2008, on or
before 28.07.2023.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
10. If the petitioner failed to deposit the compensation amount, the
sentence imposed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge,
Palani, will be restored automatically and the respondent is at liberty to
secure the petitioner to serve the remaining period of sentence.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is partly allowed.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
26.06.2023
NCC : Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No tta
To
1. The Additional District Sessions Court, Tenkasi.
2.The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Cheranmahadevi.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.
tta
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.666 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.10794 of 2018
26.06.2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!