Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Ganesh vs Mithila Naidu
2023 Latest Caselaw 7044 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7044 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2023

Madras High Court
M.Ganesh vs Mithila Naidu on 26 June, 2023
                                                                                   A.S..No.354 of 2023
                                                                              and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Dated : 26.06.2023

                                                         CORAM:

                                   THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI

                                                 A.S.No.354 of 2023
                                                        and
                                                CMP.No.12467 of 2023

                  M.Ganesh                                                       .. Appellant
                                                           Vs.
                  Mithila Naidu                                                 .. Respondent

                  PRAYER : Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil
                  Procedure, against the Judgement and Decree dated 09.03.2023 passed in
                  O.S.No.4741 of 2022, on the file of the XXIII Additional City Civil Court,
                  Chennai.
                                         For Appellant     : Mr.E.Sampath Kumar
                                         For Respondent    : Mr.K.V.Babu


                                                   JUDGMENT

The appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree

dated 09.03.2023 passed in O.S.No.4741 of 2022, on the file of the XXIII

Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

Page No.1/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit property. The

defendant was inducted as tenant in the suit property under Agreement of

lease, dated 25.10.2018 for a period of 11 months, commencing from

01.11.2018. Thereafter, the lease was renewed through another lease

agreement dated 30.09.2019 for a period of 11 months commencing from

01.10.2019. At the time of inception of tenancy, Rs.1,20,000/- was paid by

the defendant towards interest free security deposit and the defendant has

been in occupation of the suit property by paying monthly rent of Rs.15,000/-

. Besides, there is an amenities agreement entered into between plaintiff and

the defendant on 30.09.2019, for which, the defendant has to pay Rs.6,000/-

as licence fee in respect of the amenities provided in the suit property. The

defendant orally requested the plaintiff to renew the lease agreement dated

30.09.2019, but the plaintiff could not come down from foreign shore due to

outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, by way of endorsement made by

the defendant in the agreement dated 30.09.2019, the lease was renewed on

01.09.2020 and 01.08.2021 and the original lease deed is under the custody

of the defendant. As per the lease, one month notice in writing be given by

Page No.2/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

the outer party for termination of lease. The plaintiff issued a termination

notice on 30.05.2022 to the defendant calling upon him to vacate and hand

over the possession of the suit property on 30.06.2022, since the plaintiff is

desirous of occupying the suit property after carrying out suitable renovation.

To the shock and surprise of the plaintiff, the defendant issued a reply notice

dated 10.06.2022 making a false story that suit property was originally agreed

to be leased to the defendant for a period of 5 years and under reply letter,

dated 10.06.2022, the defendant has sought for minimum time of 2 years from

10.06.2022 to vacate and handover the suit property, which is not agreeable

to the plaintiff. Hence, the plaintiff issued a legal notice to the defendant on

21.06.2022 calling upon him to vacate and hand over the possession of the

suit property on or before 30.06.2022 and the same was duly served on the

defendant. Instead of complying with the notice, the defendant issued a reply

notice dated 29.06.2022 denying the very existence of subsistence of the

lease and refused to vacate the suit premises. The period of lease expired on

30.06.2022 and there was no renewal of lease. The defendant is squatting on

the suit premises without any lease agreement and the repeated efforts of the

plaintiff to vacate the defendant, ended in vain. Hence the suit.

Page No.3/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

3. The learned counsel for the defendant submitted that, after expiry of

the Lease Agreement dated 30.09.2019, no written lease agreement was

entered between the plaintiff and the defendant but this defendant

continuously paid the agreed rent to the plaintiff without any default. It is

denied that the last extension was granted on 01.08.2021 which expired on

30.06.2021. Due to pandemic, the defendant made endorsement on his own in

the original agreement on 21.08.2021 and sent a copy of the same by way of

whatsapp message. It was orally agreed between the plaintiff and the

defendant on 31.07.2021 that the tenancy would be continued for further

period of 5 years from August 2020 due to continuous lock down to control

the spread of Covid-19 virus the defendant kept the demised premises under

lock and key. The plaintiff suppressed the oral agreement entered with the

defendant on 31.07.2021. The lease agreement dated 30.09.2019 expired on

31.07.2021. The plaintiff with malafide intention issued a letter dated

30.05.2022 terminating the Lease Agreement dated 30.09.2019 which it has

lost its legal validity and required the premises for her own occupation. The

plaintiff is permanently settled in Singapore and having properties within

Chennai City. The plaintiff never used the suit premises for personal use and

Page No.4/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

occupation and more than a decade the demised premises has been occupied

by the tenants. The defendant in his reply dated 10.06.2022 requested 2 years

time to vacate the demise premises though the agreed period is 5 years but the

plaintiff without agreeing for the same filed this vexatious suit for illegal

enrichment. The defendant fixed electrical items and spending huge amount

only after extension of the agreement for 5 years from August 2020 and the

defendant is not bound to pay the amenities to the plaintiff. Even after alleged

termination, the defendant is paying monthly rents to the plaintiff regularly.

No Civil Court shall entertain any suit or proceeding in so far as it relates to

the provisions of Tamil Nadu Regulations of Rights and Responsibilities of

Landlords and Tenants Act 2017 and prayed to dismiss the suit with cost.

4. On hearing both sides, the learned trial Judge decreed the suit, and

the defendant was directed to deliver vacant possession of the suit property to

the plaintiff within one month from the date of the decree and the defendant

was directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff. By challenging the

said judgement, the defendant has preferred this appeal.

Page No.5/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

5. Heard, Mr.E.Sampath Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and

Mr. K.V.Babu learned counsel for the respondent and perused the materials

available in the record.

6. When the matter is taken up for hearing, today, counsels on both

sides appeared and submitted that the appellant has filed an affidavit dated

26.6.2023 incorporating the terms of compromise and the appellant has also

agreed to vacate the premises within a period of six months from today. On

such vacating the premises, and handing over the premises, the respondent /

landlord also agreed to pay the advance amount of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One

Lakh only) to the appellant, provided the appellant also agreed to pay

monthly rent until (before vacating) i.e. on or before 31.01.2024, along with

the maintenance charges without any default to the respondent till

31.01.2024. If the appellant fails to vacate the premises within agreed period,

the respondent is entitled to execute the decree for vacating premises directly.

To that effect, affidavit dated 26.06.2023 is also filed by the appellant.

Page No.6/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

7. Since the matter is settled out of Court, the appeal suit is

dismissed as settled out of Court. The Affidavit dated 26.06.2023 shall farm

part of the decree. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

No costs.

26.06.2023

rri

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No

To

1.The XXIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2.The Section Officer, VR section, High Court of Madras.

Page No.7/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S..No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

rri

A.S.No.354 of 2023 and CMP.No.12467 of 2023

26.06.2023

Page No.8/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter