Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6867 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 June, 2023
S.A.No.2147 of 2001
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 22.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
S.A.No.2147 of 2001
1.Alla Pitchai
2.Mustaffa ...Appellants
vs.
1.Muthukaruppa Thevar (died)
2.Sikkander
3.Usman
4.Abdulkareem
5.Pitchai Ammal
6.Hameed Beevi (died)
7.Balasubramanian
8.Ghandi @ Nagalingam
9.Manickam
10.Valli
11.Thenmozhi
12.Muthu
13.Jothi
14.Raja
15.Kannan
16.Thaleeshwari
17.Saravanan
18.Jayaraman
19.Duraisamy
20.Thillaimoorthy
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.2147 of 2001
21.Saroja
22.Nazar Sha
23.Mohamed Sha
24.Amzed Sha
25.Abdul Kalam Azad Sha
26.Abul Barakat Sha
27.Shathik Sha
28.Hajira Fathima ... Respondent
(Respondents 10 to 21 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st
respondent as per the order of Court dated 05.10.2015 in M.P(MD)Nos.2
to 4 of 2012 in S.A.No.2147 of 2001)
(Respondents 22 to 28 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 6th
respondent as per the order of Court dated 05.10.2015 in M.P(MD)No.1
of 2015 in S.A.No.2147 of 2001)
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 17.11.1999 in A.S.No.
73 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram
reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 27.02.1998 in O.S.No.173 of
1989 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court,
Ramanathapuram.
For Appellants : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramesh
for R10 to R14, R21
No appearance
for R1 to R9, R15 to R20, R22 to R28
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.2147 of 2001
JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there was no
representation for the appellants. The earlier order of this Court, dated
13.06.2023, directing the learned counsel for the appellants to ascertain
whether Parvathiammal is still alive or not and whether Parvathiammal is
a legal representative of the deceased first respondent or not has not been
complied with.
2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default
with cost of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) payable by the
appellants to the Registry to the credit of S.A.No.2147 of 2001. In case,
the appellants file any application to restore the appeal, Registry is
directed not to take the application on file unless the appellants deposit
the cost imposed by this Court.
22.06.2023
NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.2147 of 2001
To
1.The Principal District Court, Ramanathapuram.
2.The Additional District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram.
3.The Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.2147 of 2001
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
mbi
S.A.No.2147 of 2001
22.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!