Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6506 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2023
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 19.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
P.G.Seshadri ... Appellant/Respondent/
1st Defendant
Vs.
Baskaran ... Respondent/Petitioner/
Plaintiff
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule 1
(u) of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.
208 of 2010 in O.S.No.75 of 2010, dated 30.04.2010 on the file of the
learned I Additional District Court, Madurai.
For Appellant : Mr.O.Sivakumar
For Respondent : Mr.V.Nagendran
JUDGMENT
The present appeal has been filed by the 1st defendant in O.S.No.
75 of 2010 challenging an order of attachment passed by the trial Court
in I.A.No.208 of 2010.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
2. The respondent herein had filed O.S.No.75 of 2010 for recovery
of a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- based upon a pro-note, dated 10.11.2007 said
to have been executed jointly by the defendants 1 and 2. Pending suit, the
plaintiff had filed I.A.No.208 of 2010 to attach the properties contending
that the defendants are attempting to alienate the immovable property
and he would not be able to enjoy the fruits of the decree.
3. The defendants had filed a counter disputing the receipt of a
loan amount. The defendants have further contended that the plaintiff
had used some unfilled pro-notes containing the signature of the
defendants which were misplaced recently in a hand bag. In Paragraph
No.8 of the counter, the defendants have further given an undertaking
that they will not alienate or encumber the property.
4. The trial Court after considering the submissions on either side,
passed an order attaching the property. This order is under challenge in
the present appeal.
5. According to the learned counsel appearing for the appellant,
the property is already mortgaged to LIC housing development
corporation and the title deed has also been deposited with the said https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
creditor. Therefore, the question of attachment would not arise at this
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
stage. Apart from the said contention, they have also contended that they
are not liable to pay any amount to the plaintiff and the pro-notes have
been forged by the plaintiff.
6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and
respondents.
7. A perusal of the records indicate that the order of interim
attachment is in force for the past 13 years. By an order of this Court, the
records have been called for from the trial Court. Therefore, the trial has
also not proceeded with. In the above said circumstances, this Court
finds that the order of attachment shall continue till 31.12.2023. The trial
Court is directed to dispose of the suit on or before 31.12.2023. The time
schedule fixed by this Court shall be strictly adhered to.
8. With the above said observations, this Civil Miscellaneous
Appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
19.06.2023
gbg
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis : Yes / No
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
Note : Registry is directed to return all the original records to the trial Court, namely II Additional Sub Court, Madurai.
To
1.The I Additional District Court, Madurai.
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
gbg
Judgment made in C.M.A(MD)No.1334 of 2010
19.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!