Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Venkatesan vs The Presiding Officer
2023 Latest Caselaw 6413 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6413 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2023

Madras High Court
N.Venkatesan vs The Presiding Officer on 16 June, 2023
                                                                                    W.P.No.22489 of 2014

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                        Dated    :   16.06.2023

                                                      CORAM:

                            THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                                W.P.No.22489 of 2014


                    N.Venkatesan                          ...Petitioner.

                                                          Vs.

                    1.The Presiding Officer,
                      Addl.Labour Court, Vellore,
                      Vellore District.

                    2.The General Manager,
                      Tamil Nadu State Transport,
                      Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.,
                      Vellore Division – II,
                      Rangapuram, Vellore – 600 009.              ...Respondents.

                    Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                    to issue writ of certiorarified mandamus, after calling for the records
                    pertaining to the award dated 08.12.2009 in I.D.No.308/2002 passed by the
                    1st respondent in so far as depriving the petitioner 75% backwages and other
                    attendant benefits, quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent
                    to pay the petitioner 75% backwages and other attendant benefits from the
                    dismissal to the date of reinstatement, award costs.


                    1/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   W.P.No.22489 of 2014



                                   For Petitioner   : Ms.V.Porkodi
                                               for M/s.R.Krishnaswamy
                                   For Respondents :
                                   For R1           : Court
                                   For R2           : Mrs.S.Pavithra

                                           ORDER

This writ petition challenges the award of the Labour Court in

I.D.No.308/2002, insofar as it denies 75 % of the backwages to the workman.

The Labour Court vide its order dated 08.12.2009 had come to a conclusion

that the enquiry officer appointed by the management had acted in capricious

manner and had come to a conclusion that the workman was responsible for

the accident. It also held that the evidence on record is totally insufficient to

hold the charges against the petitioner as proved. Therefore, it passed an

award setting aside the order of termination dated 19.03.2002.

2. However, when it came to the question of backwages, without

assigning any reason, it reduced the amount of backwages to 25 %.

Mrs.V.Porkodi representing M/s.R.Krishnaswamy, learned counsel for the

petitioner would state that there is no reason that has been given in the award

of the Labour Court for the purpose of reducing the backwages to 25 %.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22489 of 2014

3. The position of Law has been stated by the Supreme Court in

Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya and

Ors. dated 12.08.2013 in C.A.No.6767 of 2013 in paragraph No.33 of the

said judgment, the Supreme Court was pleased to hold that in cases of

wrongful termination, reinstatement with continuity of service and

backwages is the normal rule.

4. The said authority further holds, while deciding the issue of

backwages, the adjudicating authority or court may consider the length of

service, the nature of misconduct if any found proved against the employee

and the financial conditions of employer and similar factors.

5. Mr.Ashwin, learned Counsel for the respondent would submit that

there is no previous record of the workman but in this accident, as many as

seven persons had died and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal had fixed

the responsibility on the corporation to compensate the same. These

evidences have not been let in before the Labour Court and therefore, I am

unable to come to a conclusion that the workman was responsible for the said

accident. This is more so when the Labour Court has appreciated the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.22489 of 2014

evidence and has come to a conclusion that the management has not proved

the charges levelled against the workman and that the workman was

responsible for the accident. The workman will be entitled to full backwages

instead of 25 % alone.

6. In light of the above, this writ petition stands allowed. No Costs.


                                                                                            16.06.2023
                                                                                                  (1/2)

                    nst
                    Index                 : Yes/No
                    Speaking              : Yes/No
                    Neutral Citation Case       : Yes/No

                    To:

                    1.The Presiding Officer,
                      Addl.Labour Court, Vellore,
                      Vellore District.

                    2.The General Manager,
                      Tamil Nadu State Transport,
                      Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.,
                      Vellore Division – II,
                      Rangapuram, Vellore – 600 009.






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                            W.P.No.22489 of 2014




                                  V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J
                                                   nst




                                       W.P.No.22489 of 2014






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                  W.P.No.22489 of 2014




                                        16.06.2023
                                              (1/2)






https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter