Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kannagi vs The Managing Director
2023 Latest Caselaw 6257 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6257 Mad
Judgement Date : 15 June, 2023

Madras High Court
Kannagi vs The Managing Director on 15 June, 2023
                                                                                    C.M.A.No.478 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 15.06.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                                    THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

                                                 C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

           1.Kannagi
           2.Mani                                                            ... Appellants
                                                             Vs.


           The Managing Director
           Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.
           Villupuram division - II
           Rangapuram, Vellore - 9.                                          ... Respondent



           Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles

           Act, 1988 praying against the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2019 made in

           M.C.O.P.No.675 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court,

           Vellore.

                                      For Appellants : Mr.C.Prabakaran

                                      For Respondent : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran

                                                       JUDGMENT

The appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants for enhancement of

compensation granted by the Tribunal in the award dated 17.09.2019 made in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

M.C.O.P.No.675 of 2017 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court,

Vellore.

2. The brief facts leading to the appeal are that, on 08.12.2012 at about 6.45

p.m., while the deceased Karthik was travelling as a passenger in a Government bus

bearing Registration No.TN 23 N 1796 belonging to the respondent/Transport

Corporation, from Ranipet to Arcot Road, the driver of the bus stopped the bus at

Rajeshwari junction bus stop and after some passengers got down from the bus,

suddenly started the bus without noticing that the deceased Karthik was trying to

board the bus. The deceased lost balance, fell down from the front side steps and got

stuck in the back wheels of the bus, suffered grievous injuries and later succumbed to

the same. According to the claimants, the parents of the deceased Karthik, he was

aged 18 years at the time of accident and as a Mason, he was earning a sum of

Rs.15,000/- per month. Therefore, the claimants filed the Claim Petition claiming a

sum of Rs.30,00,000/- as compensation.

3. Before the Claims Tribunal, the respondent/Transport Corporation filed a

counter denying all the averments raised in the Claim Petition apart from disputing

negligence, liability and quantum of compensation.

4. Before the Claims Tribunal, in support of their claim, the 1 st appellant/1st

claimant, mother of the deceased examined herself as P.W.1, the eye-witness was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

examined as P.W.2 and Exs.P1 to P5 were marked. On the side of the respondent,

driver of the bus was examined as R.W.1 and no documentary evidence was marked.

5. The Claims Tribunal, on an assessment of the entire evidence on record,

found that the deceased Karthik had contributed to the accident by trying to board the

running bus and therefore, fixed 10% & 90% negligence on the part of the deceased

and driver of the bus respectively and awarded a sum of Rs.8,79,500/- as

compensation along with 7.5% interest. Not satisfied with the quantum of

compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, the appellants/claimants have filed the

present appeal for enhancement of compensation.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he was not disputing the

finding on negligence arrived by the Tribunal. In view of the submissions made, the

finding of the Tribunal that the deceased Karthik had contributed to the accident and

apportionment of negligence at 10% against the deceased is not interfered with.

7. In so far as the quantum of compensation is concerned, the learned counsel

for the appellants submitted that the deceased was aged 18 years at the time of

accident and was earning a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month as a Mason and therefore,

the assessment of notional income by the Tribunal at Rs.6,000/- per month was very

meagre. The counsel further submitted that the appellants are entitled to Rs.40,000/- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

each towards loss of love and affection as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and

others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680. The Tribunal failed to award any sum towards

loss of estate. On these grounds, the learned counsel prayed for enhancement of

compensation.

8. Learned counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation on the other hand

submitted that the award of the Tribunal was fair, just and reasonable and did not call

for any interference in the appeal.

9. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel

for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

10. The short point that arises in this appeal is whether the appellants/claimants

are entitled for enhancement of compensation.

11. It is not disputed that the deceased Karthik was aged 18 years at the time of

accident and was working as a Mason. The Tribunal in the absence of any evidence

with regard to income of the deceased, fixed the notional income at Rs.6,000/- per

month. No doubt, there is no proof in support of the income of the deceased. In any

event, considering the cost escalation for the year 2012 and age of the deceased, I am https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

of the view that the notional income of the deceased can be fixed at Rs.9,000/- per

month. 40% is added towards future prospects, as the deceased died as a bachelor at

the time of accident and 50% is deducted towards personal expenses. The multiplier

'18' is adopted appropriate to the age of the deceased. Hence, the compensation

awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of dependency is modified to Rs.13,60,800/-

(Rs.6,300/- X 12 X 18).

12. Learned counsel for the appellants is justified in his contention that the

appellants, parents of the deceased are entitled to Rs.40,000/- each towards loss of

love and affection. Therefore, the award of the Tribunal under the head 'loss of love &

affection' deserves to be enhanced from Rs.50,000/- to Rs.80,000/-. The Tribunal did

not award any sum towards loss of estate. But the Tribunal has awarded Rs.5,000/-

towards transport expenses and therefore, the same is enhanced to Rs.15,000/-. The

Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.15,000/- towards funeral expenses and the same is

reasonable and hence, it is confirmed.

13. In view of the above discussions, the award of the Tribunal is modified as

follows:

S.No. Various Heads Award of the Tribunal Award of this Court

1. Loss of dependency Rs.9,07,200/- Rs.13,60,800/-

2. Loss of love & affection Rs.50,000/- Rs.80,000/-

(Rs.40,000/- X 2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

S.No. Various Heads Award of the Tribunal Award of this Court

3. Funeral expenses Rs.15,000/- Rs.15,000/-

4. Transport expenses Rs.5,000/- Rs.15,000/-

Rs.14,70,800/-

                      Total Compensation          Rs.9,77,200/-
                 90% negligence fixed on the    Rs.8,79,480/-    rounded Rs.13,23,720/-
                   Transport Corporation        off to Rs.8,79,500/-     enhanced compensation
                                                                         amount Rs.4,44,220/-

The appellants are entitled to total compensation of Rs.13,23,720/- along with interest

at the rate of 7.5% per annum (excluding the default period, if any) from the date of

petition till the date of deposit.

14. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent/Transport

Corporation that the entire amount awarded by the Tribunal along with accrued

interest and costs was already deposited before the Tribunal. In view of the said

submission, there shall be a direction to the respondent/Transport Corporation to

deposit the balance enhanced compensation of Rs.4,44,220/- along with 7.5%

interest, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of eight weeks from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such deposit being made, the

appellants/claimants shall be entitled to withdraw the same, as per the apportionment

fixed by the Tribunal, less the amount if any, already withdrawn, by making proper

application before the Claims Tribunal.

15. The appeal is accordingly partly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

15.06.2023

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No

kj

To

1. I Additional District and Sessions Judge The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Vellore.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

N.MALA.J., https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

kj

C.M.A.No.478 of 2022

15.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter