Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6242 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 June, 2023
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 14.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
C. Vadivel
...Petitioner
-Vs-
K. Sabapathy ... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of
Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order dated 06.05.2021 in
C.M.P.No.386 of 2021 in C.C.No.128 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial
Magistrate – I, Namakkal.
For Petitioner : Ms. S. P. Nirmala
For Mr. D. Shivakumaran
For Respondent : Ms. Saranya Bai
For Mr. R. Saravanan
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to set aside
the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal in
C.M.P.No. 386 of 2021 in C.C.No. 128 of 2017 dated 06.05.2021.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner had filed C.M.P.No.386 of 2021 in C.C.No.128 of 2017 before
the Judicial Magistrate Court – I, Namakkal, praying for return of
Rs.1,50,000/- deposited by him during the pendency of the appeal in
C.A.No.52 of 2020 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions
Court, Namakkal. The petitioner was acquitted by the learned Additional
District and Sessions Judge by judgment dated 12.10.2020. The
petitioner thereafter, filed an application for return of the amount
deposited by him. The said petition was dismissed on the ground that an
appeal has been filed against the acquittal before this Court in
Crl.A.No.292 of 2021.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that once the
petitioner has been acquitted, the presumption of innocence is confirmed
and the amount deposited cannot be retained, merely because an appeal
against the acquittal is filed before this Court. It is always open to the
respondent, to recover the amount, if the petitioner is found guilty and
any compensation is awarded.
4.The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that as against
the judgment of acquittal before the Additional District and Sessions
Judge, Namakkal, the respondent had filed Crl.A.No.292 of 2021 before
this Court. Therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for refund of amount
deposited till the disposal of the appeal by this Court.
5.This Court finds that once the petitioner has been acquitted for
the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, the
presumption of innocence is confirmed by a judicial pronouncement. In
such circumstances, it is not proper to retain the amount deposited by
him, merely because there is an appeal against the acquittal pending
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
before this Court. Even if this Court had to ultimately reverse the
judgment of acquittal, it is not as if, the respondent is without any
remedy.
6.Hence, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is entitled to
refund of amount deposited by him in compliance of the order passed by
appellate Court in C.M.P.No.777 of 2020 dated 24.07.2020 and the
learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal, is directed to return the
amount deposited by the petitioner as prayed for by him. Accordingly,
this Criminal Original Petition is allowed.
14.06.2023
smv
Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order
To
1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Namakkal.
2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
SUNDER MOHAN,J.
smv
Crl.O.P.No.15823 of 2021
14.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!