Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs State Of Tamil Nadu
2023 Latest Caselaw 5926 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5926 Mad
Judgement Date : 12 June, 2023

Madras High Court
Unknown vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 June, 2023
                                                               W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                           DATED: 12.06.2023

                                                CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

                                      W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017 and
                                      WMP(MD) No.6500 of 2017

                     1.A.Bharatha Vaishnavi (Minor),
                       Through her Mother and Guardian,
                       A.Premalatha.

                     2.R.Mahalakshmi (Minor),
                       Through her Mother and Guardian,
                       R.Selvi.

                     3.K.S.Santhoshi (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       K.S.Srinivasan.

                     4.N.Tharani (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       BA.Navasakthi.

                     5.J.Mubin Mutajbegam (Minor),
                       Through her Mother and Guardian,
                       J.Janndul Berthous.

                     6.M.S.Nandhini(Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       M.S.Subramanian.


                     1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017


                     7.V.Mithuna(Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       M.Vaikundam

                     8.P.Soundhariya (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       J.Pandi Saravanan.

                     9.M.Swathisarana (Minor),
                       Through her Mother and Guardian,
                       K.Jothirani

                     10.S.Rithik (Minor),
                      Through his Mother and Guardian,
                      S.Indumathy.

                     11.K.Shivi Dharshini (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       K.Kathirvel.

                     12.A.Mohammed Fazil (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       M.Aniba.

                     13.S.Varun Prakash Raj (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       A.Sundarraj.

                     14.G.Jyothika (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       V.Govindan.

                     15.J.Jaicey Cathorine (Minor),
                       Through her Grand Father and Guardian,
                        A.Francis.

                     2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017


                     16.G.Vanmathi (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       G.Gnanagurusamy.

                     17.V.P.Thillai Mageshwari (Minor),
                       Through her Father and Guardian,
                       M.Velmurugan.

                     18.R.Harsini (Minor),
                       Through her Mother and Guardian,
                       R.Bama.                                               ...Petitioners

                                                    Vs.
                     1.State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Government,
                       Department of School Education,
                       Fort St.George,
                       Secretariat,
                       Chennai – 9.

                     2.The Director of Examinations,
                       College Road,
                       Chennai – 600 006.

                     3.The Chief Educational Officer,
                       O/o the Chief Educational Officer,
                       Madurai.

                     4.The District Educational Officer,
                       O/o the District Educational Officer,
                       Melur,
                       Madurai District.                              ...Respondents


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution

                     3/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017


                     of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing
                     the respondents to award one mark to the question No.14 in A
                     Type/question No.16 in B Type in the Biology (Part II Zoology)
                     Subject in the Higher Secondary Examinations, March 2017, within
                     the time period stipulated by this Court.
                                  For Petitioners        : Mr.S.Rajasekar
                                  For Respondents        : Mr.P.T.Thiraviam
                                                           Government Advocate

                                                 ORDER

This writ petition was filed by the minor petitioners,

who are eighteen in numbers, through their natural guardians for a

Mandamus, seeking a direction to the respondents to award one

mark to the petitioners for the question No.14 in A Type/question

No.16 in B Type in the Biology (Part II Zoology) Subject in the

Higher Secondary Examinations conducted in March 2017.

2.The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners have

appeared for the Higher Secondary Examination conducted by the

respondent Board in the month of March 2017 and in the said

examination, question No.14 in A Type/question No.16 in B Type in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017

the Biology (Part II Zoology) Subject are identical questions. The

question was an objective one and that question reads as follows:-

''In a new born child, the water content is______of body weight''.

The answer given for the above question in the text book is 85% to

90%. However, the said correct answer was not provided in the

question paper. The correct answer fixed by the Board for the given

question at the time of valuation was Option A. However, answer A

as well as D are close to the correct answer i.e 85% to 90%.

According to the petitioners, question paper has not been properly

prepared and therefore, they approached this Court seeking for one

mark for the question No.14 in A Type/question No.16 in B Type in

the Biology (Part II Zoology) Subject.

3.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the

respondents on instructions fairly submits that the issue has already

been decided by the Division Bench of this Court in WA No. 565 of

2017, wherein, this Court has held as follows:-

“'9.A perusal of the documents filed in the typed set

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017

of papers reveals that as per the text book, the correct answer is 85% to 90%. Such being the case, apart from option (a) 80-90%, even option (d) – 80-95% is also the nearest option. Therefore, in our considered view that there is ambiguity as answer. The writ petitioner cannot certainly be penalised for the same. However, in our considered opinion, one mark has to be awarded to a candidate, who has selected even wrong option though not the nearest in view of the opinion of the Key Answer Preparation Committee on this issue.

10.We make it easy to the State to award one mark for the said question uniformly to all those who applied for revaluation invariably without expecting nearest answer to be marked.”

4. The above Judgment is squarely applicable to the

present case and the petitioners are also entitled for one mark for the

question No.14 in A Type/question No.16 in B Type in the Biology

(Part II Zoology) Subject in the Higher Secondary Examinations,

held on March 2017.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017

5.Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. No Costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

12.06.2023

NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. vrn

To

1.The Principal Secretary to the Government,S Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai – 9.

2.The Director of Examinations, College Road, Chennai – 600 006.

3.The Chief Educational Officer, O/o the Chief Educational Officer, Madurai.

4.The District Educational Officer, O/o the District Educational Officer, Melur, Madurai District.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

vrn

Order made in W.P(MD)No.8528 of 2017 and WMP(MD) No.6500 of 2017

12.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter