Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5890 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2023
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
1.Tmt.Ponnammal
2.Pandiammal ... Appellants/Appellants/Petitioners
Vs.
1.Rani
2.The Administrative Officer,
and Executive Engineer,
Housing Board,
Ellis Nagar,
Madurai. ... Respondents/Respondents/ Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section
100 of Code of Civil Procedure r/w. Section 372 of Indian Succession
Act, to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and decree, dated
11.03.2008 made in C.M.A.No.21 of 2005 on the file of the I Additional
District Court, Madurai confirming the order, dated 28.02.2005 made in
S.O.P.No.45 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai.
For Appellants : Mr.PT.S.Narendravasan
For R2 : Mr.R.Sivakumar
Standing Counsel
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/5
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
JUDGMENT
The present appeal has been filed by the petitioner in S.O.P.No.45
of 1997 challenging the order passed by the Courts below dismissing the
said petition.
2. The 1st appellant herein contended that she is the legally wedded
wife of one Mookaiah @ Mookudumban and the 2nd appellant claimed
that she is the daughter of the said Mookaiah @ Mookudumban.
According to the appellants, the said Mookaiah @ Mookudumban who
was working in Tamil Nadu Housing Board had passed away on
29.08.1988. The 1st respondent in the appeal also claimed that she is the
wife of the said Mookaiah @ Mookudumban. The succession O.P was
filed by the appellants for claiming the terminal benefits of the deceased
Mookaiah @ Mookudumban.
3. The trial Court after hearing both the parties, had dismissed the
said succession O.P. The appeal filed by the appellants in C.M.A.No.21
of 2005 before the I Additional District Court was also dismissed. As
against the same, the present second appeal has been filed.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
4. Pending second appeal, the 1st appellant who claims to be the
wife of the deceased Mookaiah @ Mookudumban had passed away. The
1st respondent in the appeal, namely Rani who also claimed to be the wife
of the deceased Mookaiah @ Mookudumban had passed away on
31.10.2009.
5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants had filed a
memo on 25th October 2010 to the effect that the said Rani had passed
away without leaving any issues. However, the appellants have not
initiated any action to implead the class II legal heirs of the said Rani
who had passed away 14 years back.
6. Therefore, the Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal stands
dismissed as abated. No costs.
09.06.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
gbg
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
To
1.The I Additional District Court, Madurai.
2.The Principal Sub Court, Madurai.
3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.
gbg
Judgment made in C.M.S.A(MD)No.33 of 2010
09.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!