Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sumathi Shankar vs The Managing Director
2023 Latest Caselaw 5823 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5823 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2023

Madras High Court
Sumathi Shankar vs The Managing Director on 9 June, 2023
                                                                               C.M.A.No.131 of 2022


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 09.06.2023

                                                       CORAM:

                                     THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA

                                                 C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

           1.Sumathi Shankar

           2.Naveen Kumar

           3.Nandhini Sivakumar                                               ... Appellants

                                                         Vs.


           The Managing Director
           KSRTC, Bangalore
           Chikmagalur Division
           Chikmagalur District.                                              ... Respondent


           Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles

           Act, 1988 praying against the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2020 made in

           M.C.O.P.No.845 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special

           District Court for MAC cases, Krishnagiri.



                                      For Appellants   : Mr.S.P.Yuaraj

                                      For Respondent   : Mr.T.Thiyagarajan


                                                       JUDGMENT

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

The appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants for enhancement of

compensation granted by the Tribunal in the award dated 11.03.2020 made in

M.C.O.P.No.845 of 2019 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special

District Court for MAC cases, Krishnagiri.

2. The brief facts leading to the appeal are that, on 14.10.2018 at about 11.40

hours, while the deceased Shankar was travelling with his brother in a motor cycle

bearing Registration No.TN 83 T 2684 as a pillion rider, in Karkala Bajagoli to Udupi

N.H. Road near Athrady, the driver of the KSRTC bus bearing Registration No.KA-

18-F-0727, hit against the motor cycle, causing grievous injuries to Shankar, who

subsequently succumbed to his injuries on 16.10.2018. According to the appellants,

the accident occurred only due to rash and negligent driving by the driver of KSRTC

bus. The deceased Shankar was aged 49 years at the time of accident and as a

self-employed, he was earning a sum of Rs.40,000/- per month. Therefore, the widow

and children of the deceased Shankar filed the Claim Petition seeking a sum of

Rs.50,00,000/- as compensation, for his death.

3. Before the Claims Tribunal, the respondent/Transport Corporation filed a

detailed counter denying all the averments raised in the claim petition including

negligence, liability and quantum of compensation.

4. Before the Claims Tribunal, the 2nd appellant/2nd claimant, son of the deceased https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

Shankar, examined himself as P.W.1, the eye-witness was examined as P.W.2 and 14

documents were marked as Exs.P1 to P14. On the side of the respondent/Transport

Corporation, the driver of the bus was examined as R.W.1 and no documentary

evidence was filed.

5. The Claims Tribunal, on an assessment of the entire evidence on record,

rendered the finding of negligence against the driver of the KSRTC bus and assessed

the compensation at Rs.13,01,183/- along with 7.5% interest. Not satisfied with the

quantum of compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal, the appellants/claimants

have filed the above appeal for enhancement of compensation.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants/claimants submitted that the assessment of

income at Rs.9,000/- by the Tribunal is very much meagre. Considering that the

accident took place in the year 2018, the deceased was aged 49 years at the time of

accident and was doing cloth business by setting up temporary shops & exhibition sale

stalls according to the counsel, the Tribunal ought to have assessed higher income.

The counsel for the appellants further submitted that the assessment of compensation

under the heads “loss of consortium” and “loss of love & affection” are meagre and

against the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance

Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680. The

learned counsel therefore pleaded that the award passed by the Tribunal deserved to

be enhanced.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

7. Learned counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation on the other hand

submitted that the award of the Tribunal was fair, just and reasonable and did not call

for any interference in the appeal.

8. I have heard both the learned counsel and perused the entire materials placed

on record.

9. It is seen from the records that the accident occurred in the year 2018, the

deceased was aged 49 years at the time of accident and was maintaining a family of

three members. According to the appellants, the deceased was doing cloth business

and was earning a sum of Rs.40,000/- per month. In the absence of any material with

regard to income of the deceased, the Tribunal fixed the notional income of the

deceased at Rs.9,000/- per month. Considering the cost escalation for the year 2018

and also the avocation of the deceased Shankar, I am of the view that the notional

income can be fixed at Rs.12,000/- per month. The Tribunal added 25% towards

future prospects, applied multiplier '13' and deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses

of the deceased. Thus, by fixing the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.12,000/-,

the compensation awarded by the Tribunal towards loss of dependency is modified to

Rs.15,60,000/- (Rs.12,000/- + 3000 [Rs.12,000/- X 25%] X 12 X 13 X 2/3).

Therefore, the appellants/claimants are entitled to Rs.15,60,000/- towards loss of

dependency. I find that the Tribunal awarded Rs.20,000/- towards loss of estate, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

which is on the higher side and therefore, the award towards loss of estate is reduced

to Rs.15,000/-. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards loss of

consortium and Rs.30,000/- towards loss of love and affection. I agree with the

submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants are entitled to

higher compensation under those heads. As per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and

others reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, the 1st appellant, wife of the deceased, shall be

entitled to Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium and the appellants 2 & 3, who are

son and daughter of the deceased Shankar shall be entitled to Rs.40,000/- each

towards loss of love & affection. The award of the Tribunal under other heads are

confirmed.

10. In view of the above discussions, the award of the Tribunal is modified as

follows:

S.No. Various Heads Award of the Tribunal Award of this Court

1. Loss of dependancy Rs.11,70,000/- Rs.15,60,000/-

           2.          Loss of estate               Rs.20,000/-               Rs.15,000/-
           3.          Funeral expenses             Rs.15,000/-               Rs.15,000/-
           4.          Loss of consortium to the 1st Rs.20,000/-              Rs.40,000/-
                       appellant
           5.          Loss of love & affection to Rs.30,000/-                Rs.80,000/-
                       the appellants 2 & 3                                   (Rs.40,000/- X 2)
           6.          Hospital bills               Rs.29,331/-               Rs.29,331/-
           7.          Ambulance bill               Rs.16,852/-               Rs.16,852/-
                                                                              Rs.17,56,183/-
                       Total Compensation           Rs.13,01,183/-            enhanced            amount
                                                                              Rs.4,55,000/-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis



                                                                                       C.M.A.No.131 of 2022


The compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.13,01,183/- is hereby enhanced to

Rs.17,56,183/- along with interest at 7.5% per annum.

11. Learned counsel for the respondent/Transport Corporation submitted that

the entire amount awarded by the Tribunal along with accrued interest and costs has

already been deposited in the execution proceedings. In view of the said submission,

the respondent is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs.4,55,000/- along with

7.5% interest and costs, less the amount already deposited if any, within a period of

four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. On such deposit being

made, the appellants/claimants shall be entitled to withdraw their respective share of

the award amount now determined by this Court, as per the apportionment fixed by

the Tribunal, along with proportionate interest and costs, less the amount if any,

already withdrawn, by making appropriate application before the Tribunal.

12. The appeal is accordingly partly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs.

09.06.2023

Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No

kj https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

To

1.The Special District Judge Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Krishnagiri.

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

N.MALA.J.,

kj

C.M.A.No.131 of 2022

09.06.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter