Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5559 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2023
W.A.No.278 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.06.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.No.278 of 2021
1. The Commissioner and Secretary
to Government of Tamil Nadu
Industries Department, Fort St. George
Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Industries Commissioner and
Director of Industries and Commerce
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
3. The General Manager
District Industries Centre
Namakkal District. .. Appellants
Vs.
Sri Muhuntha Paper Boards
Rep. by its Managing Partner Thiru S.Jagadeesh
S.F.No.14/2, D. No.294/2, 3 & 4
Sanapalayam, Pullagoundampatti (P.O.)
Tiruchengode (TK)
Namakkal District. .. Respondents
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.278 of 2021
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order dated 06.08.2018 made in W.P.No.28167 of 2010.
For the Appellants : Mrs.R.Anitha
Spl. Government Pleader
For the Respondent : Mr.P.D.Sriram
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
The appellants assail the order passed by the learned Single
Judge of this Court dated 06.08.2018 in W.P.No.28167 of 2010.
2. In the said writ petition, the present respondent sought
directions, to issue eligibility certificate and release low tension
power tariff subsidy, to the appellants for S.C.Nos.409 and 410 for
the period from 11.05.2001 to 17.04.2004.
3. Learned Special Government Pleader contends that in fact,
in view of the circular dated 11.06.2002, the present respondent
was not entitled for the low tension subsidy. In the year 2006, the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.278 of 2021
respondent converted the same into a high tension line. This fact
shows that only to get a subsidy, the respondent tried to show three
different connections of 150 HP load. He would have been entitled
only for one HP load of 150.
4. We have gone through the order of the learned Single
Judge. While passing the impugned order, the learned Single Judge
relied upon the decision of a Division Bench of this Court dated
31.01.2007 in W.A.No.1576 of 2004. In the said judgment, the
Division Bench held that the circular dated 11.06.2002 would not
have retrospective effect. In the case before the Division Bench, the
petitioner therein also has applied for three connections.
5. The learned Single Judge has relied upon the judgment of
the Division Bench and passed the impugned order and even the
learned Special Government Pleader acceded to the position of law
as existing thereunder.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.278 of 2021
6. In the light of the above, no case for interference is made
out. Accordingly, the writ appeal as such is disposed of. There will be
no order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
06.06.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
kpl/drm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.278 of 2021
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
(kpl/drm)
W.A.No.278 of 2021
06.06.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!