Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5318 Mad
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2023
W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 02.06.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
and
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023
and
C.M.P.(MD) No.5878 of 2023
The General Manager
Tamil Nadu State Transport
Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited
Karur Region, Karur District ... Appellant
-vs-
R.Sirumbanan ... Respondent
Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the
order, dated 11.10.2022, passed in W.P.(MD) No.20629 of 2022, on the file of
this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh
For Respondent : Mr.D.Srinivasaraghavan
for Mr.D.Anbarasu
____________
Page 1 of 4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
Challenge in this writ appeal is to the order of the Writ Court
sustaining the writ petition filed by the respondent / writ petitioner seeking to
quash the impugned order of punishment on the ground that the punishment
that was imposed on the respondent / writ petitioner was not prescribed in
the Standing Orders. The punishment that was imposed on the respondent is
reduction of time scale of pay. The Writ Court has found that such a
punishment is not prescribed under the Standing Orders.
2. Mr.S.C.Herold Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, would,
however, draw our attention to the Standing Order 14(2) and contend that
there can be a punishment of reduction in time scale of pay.
3. We are unable to concur with the said submission. Standing
Order 14(2) provides for effect of the punishment of reduction to a lower rank
and the Standing Order 17 provides for reduction in rank. None of these
provisions authorize imposition of punishment of reduction of time scale of
pay. Therefore, we are unable to find fault with the Writ Court having held
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023
that imposition of such punishment is not prescribed under the Standing
Orders. The Writ Court has also relied upon the Judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Vijay Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & others,
reported in (2012) 5 SCC 242, which is also to the same effect. Hence, we
find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Writ Court.
The writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
02.06.2023
NCC : Yes / No
Index : Yes / No
Internet : Yes / No
krk
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
krk
W.A.(MD) No.633 of 2023 and C.M.P.(MD) No.5878 of 2023
02.06.2023
____________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!