Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G.Alphonse vs The Principal Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 9197 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9197 Mad
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2023

Madras High Court
G.Alphonse vs The Principal Secretary on 28 July, 2023
                                                                      W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 28.07.2023

                                                     CORAM:

                             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

                                          W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

                     W.P.No.13908 of 2015 :-

                     G.Alphonse                                                 ...Petitioner

                                                        -Vs-

                     1. The Principal Secretary,
                        Education Department,
                        Fort St. George,
                        Chennai – 600 009.

                     2. The Director of Elementary Education,
                        Nungambakkam,
                        Chennai – 600 006.

                     3. The District Elementary Education Officer,
                        O/o. The District Elementary Education Office,
                        Neela South Street,
                        Nagappattinam.                                          ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioner as secondary grade teacher with effect from the date of the petitioner's joining in the service i.e., on 01.12.2005 in the light of the order passed by the first respondent for the similarly placed secondary grade teacher in G.O.Ms.(3D)No.78, School https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

Education (G2) Department dated 25.05.2012 and G.O.Ms.(3D).No.4, School Education Department dated 21.01.2015.

In all W.Ps.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Subramanian

For Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy Additional Government Pleader

COMMON ORDER

All these writ petitions have been filed to direct the

respondents to regularize the service of the petitioners as secondary grade

teacher with effect from the date of the petitioners' joining in the service,

in the light of the order passed by the first respondent for the similarly

placed secondary grade teacher in G.O.Ms.(3D)No.78, School Education

(G2) Department dated 25.05.2012 and G.O.Ms.(3D).No.4, School

Education Department dated 21.01.2015.

2. The petitioners were appointed in the post of secondary

grade teacher on consolidated pay of Rs.3000/- on temporary basis and

they were joined in service in different dates. Subsequently, vide the

government order in G.O.Ms.No.99, School Education Department, dated

27.06.2002, their services were regularized from 01.06.2006 and put on

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

regular scale of pay. Some of the similarly placed teachers had

approached this Court in W.P.No.879 of 2006 and W.P.No.30734 of

2008 for direction to direct the respondents to regularize their service

from the date on which they were appointed as secondary grade teacher

on consolidated pay. This Court allowed the above writ petitions and

directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners

in that petition.

3. Accordingly, the first respondent passed a government order

in G.O.Ms.(3D)No.78, School Education (G2) Department, dated

25.05.2012, thereby regularize the service of the petitioners in

W.P.No.879 of 2006 and W.P.No.30734 of 2008 from the date of their

appointment of service on the consolidated pay. Based on the said

G.O.Ms.(3D)No.78, another set of teachers were also filed writ petition

before this Court in W.P.No.2501 of 2014 and this Court directed the

first respondent to consider their case in the light of G.O.Ms.(3D)No.78,

dated 25.05.2012.

4. Accordingly, the first respondent passed another government

order in G.O.Ms.(3D) No.4 School Education Department, dated https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

21.01.2015, thereby regularize the service of the petitioners in

W.P.No.2501 of 2014, from the date of their appointment of service on

consolidated pay. Based on those government orders, the petitioners also

submitted their representation seeking regularization of their service from

the date of their appointment on temporary basis on consolidated pay.

5. While pending these writ petitions, some other similarly

placed teachers filed writ petition in W.P.No.4991 of 2015 seeking Writ

of Mandamus to regularize their service from the date of their initial

appointment with all consequential monetary benefits based on the above

said government orders. Though the learned single Judge allowed the writ

petition, it was challenged by the government in W.A.No.3904 of 2019.

The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court modified the order to the effect

that the seniority of the petitioners be regularized from the date of initial

appointment and the monetary benefits shall be given from the date of

regularization viz., from 01.06.2006.

6. Aggrieved by the said order some third party teachers filed

Review Application before this Court in Rev.Appln.No.60 of 2020, to

review the order passed in the writ appeal in W.A.No.3904 of 2019. The

Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court after considering the subsequent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

development and the several Government orders, recalled the order

passed in writ appeal in W.A.No.3904 of 2019 and allowed the writ

appeal in toto, thereby dismissing the writ petition seeking regularization

of service from the date of the initial appointment of temporary basis on

consolidated pay.

7. That apart, the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court also

ordered that any order passed by this Court placing reliance of the above

judgments cannot be given effect to, in view of the order passed in the

review application in Rev.Appln.No.60 of 2020. Though some of the

teachers were given effect to their regularization from the date of their

original appointment on consolidated pay, in view of the order passed by

this Court in Rev.Appln.No.60 of 2020, thereby recalling the order

passed in W.A.No.3904 of 2019 dated 30.07.2019, the petitioners are not

entitled for the relief sought for in these writ petitions.

8. Hence, all the Writ Petitions are devoid of merits and liable

to be dismissed and accordingly, dismissed. There shall be no order as to

cost.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

28.07.2023 Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order

rts

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

To

1. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The Director of Elementary Education, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 006.

3. The District Elementary Education Officer, O/o. The District Elementary Education Office, Neela South Street, Nagappattinam.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

rts

W.P.Nos.13908 to 13921 of 2015

28.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter