Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9164 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2023
W.A.No.1902 of 2023 etc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.07.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.Nos.1902, 1907, 1909, 1910, 1911 and 1913 of 2023
W.A.No.1902 of 2023:
1 The Special Commissioner,
and Commissioner of Land Reforms,
Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
2 The Assistant Commissioner/
Urban Land Tax and
Competent Authority of Urban Land Ceiling,
Ambattur @ Poonamallee,
Chennai-600 056.
3 The Tahsildar
Ambattur,
Chennai-600 053. .. Appellants
Vs
R.Bharathi .. Respondent
__________
Page 1 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1902 of 2023 etc.
Prayer: W.A.No.1902 of 2023 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
Patent to set aside the order dated 22.03.2021 passed in
W.P.No.15859 of 2007 by the learned Single Judge.
and batch cases
For the Appellants : Mr.S.Silambanan
in all appeals Addl. Advocate General
assisted by
Mr.K.Karthick Jegannath
Government Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr.V.Ramesh
in all appeals for Mr.T.Thiyagarajan
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Additional
Advocate General, assisted by Mr.K.Karthick Jegannath, learned
Government Advocate for the appellants and Mr.V.Ramesh,
learned counsel for the respondents in all the appeals.
__________
Page 2 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1902 of 2023 etc.
2. The appellants assail the order passed by the learned
Single Judge thereby allowing the writ petitions and holding that
the impugned proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land
(Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 stands abated. Directions are
given to mutate the names of the original writ petitioners and to
issue pattas.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General has produced the
record and proceedings. From the record and proceedings, the
learned Additional Advocate General could not point out that
the relevant notice under Section 11(5) of the Tamil Nadu Urban
Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1978 is issued to the land
owners. There is no document evidencing delivery of possession
signed by the land owners.
4. In the absence of the statutory notice being given, the
proceedings rightly abate. Reference can be had to the judgment of
__________
Page 3 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1902 of 2023 etc.
the Apex Court in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Hari Ram,
(2013) 4 SCC 280.
5. In the light of the above, the learned Single Judge has
properly appreciated the facts and passed the impugned order.
6. The writ appeals, being devoid of merits, stand dismissed.
There will be no order as to costs. Consequently,
C.M.P.Nos.16395, 16396, 16407, 16410, 16416, 16426, 16427
and 16432 of 2023.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
27.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
sasi
__________
Page 4 of 5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1902 of 2023 etc.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.
(sasi)
W.A.Nos.1902, 1907, 1909, 1910, 1911 and 1913 of
27.07.2023
__________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!