Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

3 The Tahsildar vs V.M.Tharani
2023 Latest Caselaw 9120 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9120 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2023

Madras High Court
3 The Tahsildar vs V.M.Tharani on 27 July, 2023
                                                                       W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED:    27.07.2023

                                                     CORAM :

                           THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                         AND
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU


                         W.A.Nos.1846, 1898, 1900, 1901, 1903, 1904, 1906, 1912, 1915
                                               and 1926 of 2023


                     W.A.No.1846 of 2023:

                     1      The Principal Commissioner
                            and Commissioner of Land Reforms,
                            Chepauk,
                            Chennai-600 005.

                     2      The Assistant Commissioner/
                            Competent Authority (Urban Land Ceiling)
                            Sannadhi Street, Poonamallee,
                            Chennai-600 056.

                     3      The Tahsildar
                            Poonamallee Taluk
                            Poonamallee.                                   .. Appellants


                                                         Vs
                     V.M.Tharani                                           .. Respondent




                     __________
                     Page 1 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                     Prayer: W.A.No.1846 of 2023 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters
                     Patent to set aside the order dated 23.11.2021 passed in
                     W.P.No.11692 of 2006 by the learned Single Judge.
                     and batch cases



                                      For the Appellants      : Mr.S.Silambanan
                                      in all appeals            Addl. Advocate General
                                                                assisted by
                                                                Mr.K.Karthick Jegannath
                                                                Government Advocate

                                      For the Respondent      : Mr.V.Ramesh
                                      in all appeals            for Mr.T.Thiyagarajan


                                                   COMMON JUDGMENT
                                          (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)



                                  We have heard Mr.S.Silambanan, learned Additional Advocate

                     General, assisted by Mr.K.Karthick Jegannath, learned Government

                     Advocate for the appellants; and Mr.V.Ramesh, learned counsel for

                     the respondents in all the appeals.



                                  2. The appellants assail the order passed by the learned

                     Single Judge thereby allowing the writ petitions and holding that the


                     __________
                     Page 2 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                         W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                     impugned proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling

                     and Regulation) Act, 1978 stands lapsed. Directions are given to

                     mutate the names of the original writ petitioners and to issue

                     pattas.



                                  3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the

                     learned Single Judge failed to consider that notice under Section

                     11(5) of the Act of 1978 was issued on all the erstwhile owners of

                     the property.          The possession receipt is also on record.       The

                     notification under Section 11(3) of the Act of 1978 was issued. The

                     notice under Section 12(7) of the Act of 1978 was issued and order

                     under Section 12(6) of the Act of 1978 was passed. In view of that,

                     the learned Single Judge could not have observed that the relevant

                     notices have not been issued.



                                  4. Learned counsel for the respondents denies the said

                     contention and submits that no notices were issued.



                                  5. The learned Single Judge has come to the conclusion that


                     __________
                     Page 3 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                     W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                     the entire work undertaken by the appellants herein was desk work

                     and physical possession was not taken.



                                  6. We also perused the documents, which, according to the

                     appellants,           are    the    documents     evidencing       the    delivery    of

                     possession.               Such document is only signed by the government

                     officers.         It does not bear the signature of the land occupant/

                     owner. Even no notice appears on record to be given to the owner

                     that the possession would be taken on a particular date.                             The

                     surrender            of    possession   was    not   a   voluntary       surrender    of

                     possession. As there is no voluntary surrender of possession, the

                     only         other    mode     of   taking    possession   is     forceful   mode     of

                     dispossession.             Notices under Sub-sections (5) and (6) of Section

                     11 of the Act of 1978 were also not issued. The same is held to be

                     mandatory.



                                  7. It also appears that the respondents are residing in the writ

                     lands.         They have their houses constructed.               The learned Single

                     Judge has rightly come to the conclusion that the entire work done


                     __________
                     Page 4 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                           W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                     by the appellants herein was only desk work and no physical

                     possession has been taken as yet and, therefore, the entire

                     acquisition has lapsed as per the Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling

                     and Regulation) Repeal Act [Act 20 of 1999].



                                  8. We do not find any error committed by the learned Single

                     Judge while passing the impugned order.



                                  9. The writ appeals, as such, are dismissed.        There    will

                     be no order as to costs. Consequently, C.M.P.Nos.16171, 16172,

                     16380, 16381, 16387, 16388, 16391, 16392, 16399, 16401,

                     16404, 16405, 16406, 16475, 16476, 16464, 16436, 16518 and

                     16519 of 2023 are closed.



                                                         (S.V.G., CJ.)                (P.D.A., J.)
                                                                         27.07.2023
                     Index            :            Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation :            Yes/No
                     sasi




                     __________
                     Page 5 of 6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                           W.A.No.1846 of 2023 etc.



                                                   THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                                        AND
                                                         P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J.

(sasi)

W.A.Nos.1846, 1898, 1900, 1901, 1903, 1904, 1906, 1912, 1915 and 1926 of 2023

27.07.2023

__________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter