Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9081 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2023
S.A.No.628 of 2004
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 26.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.A.No.628 of 2004
Diwan Ali Rowther
... Appellant
-vs-
1.Arunachala Nadar
2.Shahul Hameed
... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 Code of Civil
Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 26.06.1996 made in
A.S.No.73 of 1992 on the file of the Sub Judge, Tenkasi confirming the
Judgment and Decree dated 27.01.1990 made in O.S.No.183 of 1986 on
the file of the District Munsif, Tenkasi.
For Appellant ... No appearance
For Respondents ... No appearance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/3
S.A.No.628 of 2004
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.07.2023, there
was no representation for the appellant. Hence, it is listed today under
the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the
appellant. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
26.07.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes skn
To:
1.The Sub Judge, Tenkasi.
2.The District Munsif, Tenkasi.
3.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.628 of 2004
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.
skn
S.A.No.628 of 2004
26.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!