Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9061 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2023
Cont.pet.No.1339 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Contempt Petition No.1339 of 2023
B.Rajeswari ... Petitioner
...Vs...
1. Thiruvambalam Pillai,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
(cbe), Ltd.,
Managing Director,
37, Mettupalayam Road,
Coimbatore.
2. Gopala Krishnan,
The Assistant Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
(cbe), Ltd.,
Chennimalai Road, Erode. .... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
to punish the Respondents for wilful disobedience of the order and for
committing an act of contempt in failing to comply with the order passed by
this Court in W.A.No.1692 of 2022 dated 12.01.2023.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
Cont.pet.No.1339 of 2023
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
For Respondents : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran
Special Government Pleader
***
ORDER
This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the
judgment dated 12.01.2023 passed in W.A.No.1692 of 2022 by this Court.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 28.06.2023, the
learned Special Government Pleader had filed an Affidavit dated 27.06.2023,
seeking time to comply with the other portion of the judgment dated
12.01.2023 in W.A.No.1692 of 2022 in granting service benefits and at his
request, the matter was directed to be listed today.
3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned
Special Government Pleader appearing for the Respondents submitted that
promotion has been given to the Petitioner as Assistant Manager with effect
from 24.07.2023 and therefore, the judgment seeking noncompliance of
which, this contempt petition has been filed, has been complied with.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.pet.No.1339 of 2023
4. In reply, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that even
though promotion has been granted with effect from 24.07.2023, she has not
been granted with monetary benefits that she is entitled to.
5. In the case on hand, the issue is whether promotion and other
benefits have got to be extended with retrospective effect. We are afraid that
this issue cannot be dealt with in contempt jurisdiction, for, in contempt
jurisdiction, what is to be seen is only the compliance or otherwise of the
order and nothing beyond that.
In view of the same, this Contempt Petition stands closed, leaving all
the issues open, to be agitated before the appropriate forum, in the manner
known to law, if so advised.
[S.V.N,J.,] [M.S.Q,J.,] 26.07.2023
arr
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.pet.No.1339 of 2023
S.VAIDYANATHAN, J and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
arr
Contempt Petition No.1339 of 2023
26.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.pet.No.1339 of 2023
26.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!