Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M.Thambusami vs The Union Of India
2023 Latest Caselaw 8951 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8951 Mad
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2023

Madras High Court
M.Thambusami vs The Union Of India on 25 July, 2023
                                                                              W.P.No.2582 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 25.07.2023

                                                     CORAM :

                       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                               W.P.No.2582 of 2020

                     M.Thambusami                                          ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus

                     1.The Union of India,
                       Rep.by the Secretary to Ministry of Home Affairs,
                       North Block Secretariat,
                       New Delhi.

                     2.The Director General,
                       CRPF, CGO Complex,
                       Lodhi Road,
                       New Delhi – 110 003.

                     3.The Special Director General of Police,
                       South zone, CRPF,
                       Chandrankutta,
                       Hyderabad – 500005.

                     4.The Inspector General of Police,
                       Southern Sector, CRPF,
                       Road No.10 C, Jubilee Hills,
                       Near MLA/MPs Colony, Gayathri Hills,
                       Hyderabad – 500033.

                     5.The Director of Accounts,
                       PAO, CRPF,
                       No.14, PSP -2, Rohini Sector -23,
                       New Delhi – 110 085.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                     Page No.1 of 6
                                                                                      W.P.No.2582 of 2020



                     6.The Commandant,
                       77 Battalion, CRPF,
                       Special Jail Complex,
                       Poonamalee,
                       Chennai – 600 056.                                    … Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents
                     to consider the representation dated 10.01.2020 of the petitioner and to
                     grant one notional increment to him for the period from 1 st July 2011 to 30th
                     June 2012 and re-fix his pension by adding one notional increment and
                     subsequently re-fix the pension after the seventh Central Pay Commission
                     and the arrears thereof be paid to him within the time that may be fixed by
                     this Court.

                                        For Petitioner    :     Mr. R. Meenakshi

                                        For Respondents :       Mr. S. Diwakar

                                                           ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking a direction to direct the

respondents to consider the representation dated 10.01.2020 of the

petitioner and to grant one notional increment to him for the period from 1 st

July 2011 to 30th June 2012 and re-fix his pension by adding one notional

increment and subsequently re-fix the pension after the seventh Central Pay

Commission and the arrears thereof be paid to him within the time that

may be fixed by this Court.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.2582 of 2020

2.The case of the petitioner is that he retired as Deputy Commandant

in Central Reserve Police Force on superannuation with effect from

30.06.2012. During the implementation of the 6th Pay Commission, the

Central Government had fixed the 1st of July of every year as the date of

increment for all employees. The grievance of the petitioner is that since his

retirement had fallen on 1st July 2012, he was not given an increment by

treating him as he was on duty. According to the petitioner, though the

increment was fixed on 1st July, he completed one year of service from

1.07.2011 to 30.06.2012, he is entitled to one notional increment as on his

retirement date i.e., on 01.07.2012 and revision of his pension accordingly.

In this regard, he made representation to the respondents dated

10.01.2020, seeking to grant one notional increment and to revise his

pension. Since no response is forthcoming from the respondents despite the

representations, the petitioner is before this Court.

3.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents and

perused the material records of the case.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.2582 of 2020

4.The issue involved in this Writ Petition has been covered by the

order of this Court dated 15.09.2017 in W.P.No.15732 of 2017, wherein,

under similar circumstances, this Court has observed as under:

“7.The petitioner herein had completed one full year service as on 30.06.2013, but the increment fell due on 01.07.2013, on which date he was not in service. In view of the above judgment of this Court, naturally he has to be treated as having completed one full year of service, though the date of increment falls on the next day of his retirement. Applying the said judgment to the present case, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order passed by the first respondent-Tribunal dated 21.03.2017 is quashed. The petitioner shall be given one notional increment for the period from 01.07.2012 to 30.06.2013, as he has completed one full year of service, though his increment fell on 01.07.2013, for the purpose of pensionary benefits and not for any other purpose. No costs.”

5.In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the above said

order will hold good to the present writ petition also, accordingly, the

second respondent is hereby directed to consider the petitioner's

representation dated 10.01.2020 and pass an appropriate order in

accordance with the law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.2582 of 2020

6.The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above direction and

observation. No costs.


                                                                               25.07.2023

                     Index                   :     Yes/No
                     Speaking Order          :     Yes/No
                     Neutral Citation        :     Yes/No

                     klt

                     To:

1.The Secretary to Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India, North Block Secretariat, New Delhi.

2.The Director General, CRPF, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110 003.

3.The Special Director General of Police, South zone, CRPF, Chandrankutta, Hyderabad – 500005.

4.The Inspector General of Police, Southern Sector, CRPF, Road No.10 C, Jubilee Hills, Near MLA/MPs Colony, Gayathri Hills, Hyderabad – 500033.

5.The Director of Accounts, PAO, CRPF, No.14, PSP -2, Rohini Sector -23, New Delhi – 110 085.

6.The Commandant, 77 Battalion, CRPF, Special Jail Complex, Poonamalee, Chennai – 600 056.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.2582 of 2020

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

klt

W.P.No.2582 of 2020

25.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter