Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8637 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 19.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
C.R.P(N.P.D).Nos.1927, 1928 and 1929 of 2004
and
C.M.P.Nos.14401, 14402 and 14403 of 2004
In C.R.P (NPD). No.1927 of 2004
1.Gandhimathi
2.United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,
95, Big Street, Tiruvannamalai. ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.Gandhi
2.Managing Director,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,
Dharmapuri. ...Respondents
Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to allow this Civil Revision Petition against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.472 of 1999 dated 31.12.2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Addl. Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
In C.R.P (NPD). No.1928 of 2004
1.Gandhimathi
2.United India Insurance Co.Ltd., 95, Big Street, Tiruvannamalai. ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.Saroja
2.Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Dharmapuri. ...Respondents
Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India to allow this Civil Revision Petition against the judgment and decree in
M.C.O.P.No.470 of 1999 dated 31.12.2002 on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Addl. Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
In C.R.P (NPD). No.1929 of 2004
1.Gandhimathi
2.United India Insurance Co.Ltd., 95, Big Street, Tiruvannamalai. ...Petitioners
Vs.
1.Janakiraman
2.Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Dharmapuri. ...Respondents
Prayer:Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India to allow this Civil Revision Petition against the judgment and decree in
M.C.O.P.No.470 of 1999 dated 31.12.2002 on the file of the Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal, Addl. Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.
In all C.R.Ps.
For Petitioners : Ms.C.Harini
For Respondents :
COMMONORDER
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
These three Civil Revision Petitions, challenge the order of Motor
Accidents Claims Tribunal in M.C.O.P.Nos.470, 471 and 472 of 1999. The
Claims Tribunal had come to a conclusion that the 2nd Respondent/Managing
Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Dharmapuri as well as
the 1st respondent vehicle are responsible for this accident.
2. The claim of the Civil Revision Petitioners are that the liability
should have been fasten only on the 2nd respondent and not on the 1st
petitioner. That is a factual finding which I do not want to interfere under
Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. Apart from that, the compensation that has been granted is less
than Rs.5000/-. Therefore, I am not inclined to interfere with the revisions.
4. With the above, these Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed. No
costs. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
19.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
nst
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN.J.,
nst
To:
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Addl. Sub Court, Tiruvannamalai.
C.R.P(N.P.D).Nos.1927, 1928 and 1929 of 2004 and C.M.P.Nos.14401, 14402 and 14403 of 2004
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
19.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!