Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Palani
2023 Latest Caselaw 8470 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8470 Mad
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2023

Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs P.Palani on 18 July, 2023
                                                                             W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and
                                                                                W.P.No.15427 of 2010

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 18.07.2023

                                                      CORAM :

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
                                                          and
                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. B.BALAJI
                                              W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and
                                               CMP No.13150 of 2018
                                                          and
                                              W.P.No.15427 of 2010 and
                                                 MP No.2 to 3 of 2015
                     1. The State of Tamil Nadu,
                        rep. by the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu,
                        Revenue Department, Fort St. George,
                        Chennai -9.

                     2. The Chairman and Managing Director,
                        Tamil Nadu Corporation of Industrial Development,
                        Greenways Road, Chennai.

                     3. The District Collector, Dharmapuri District.

                     4. The District Revenue Officer,
                        Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

                     5. The Special Tahsildar (LA), TACID Phase II Office,
                        Pochampalli, Uthangarai Taluk.                             ... Appellants

                                               Vs.

                     Page 1 of 8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                             W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and
                                                                                W.P.No.15427 of 2010



                     1.P.Palani
                     2. P.Perumal
                     3. A.Angammal
                     4. Periyannan                                              ... Respondents

In W.P.No.15427/2010

1. P.Palani

2. P.Perumal

3. A.Angammal ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -600 009.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Corporation of Industrial Development, Greenways Road, Chennai.

3. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

4. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District.

5. The Special Tahsildar (LA), TACID Phase II Office, Pochampalli, Uthangarai Taluk. ... Respondents

Prayer in Writ Appeal: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent

to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.4105/2003 dated

26.02.2004.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

Prayer in Writ Petition: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to withdraw the proposed acquisition of the lands belonging to the petitioners in S.No.64/2B2, 64/2B3, 64/2C and 66 to the extent of 4.32 acres and 5 acres in Reddipatti Village, Oothangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District and to release the lands of the petitioners from acquisition proceedings.

For Appellants/Respondents : Mr.UM Ravichandran, Spl.Govt.Pleader

For Writ petitioners/Respondents : Mrs.Arulmozhi

COMMON JUDGEMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.)

This Intra Court Appeal has been filed by the Government,

challenging the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.4105/2003 dated

26.02.2004, whereby the Writ Court has directed the Special Tahsildar

(L & A), TACID phase II office, Pochampalli, Uthangarai Taluk to verify as

to the ownership of the writ petitioners in respect of the lands and the survey

numbers furnished in the writ petition and withdraw the compensation

amount that has been deposited in respect of the land acquisition

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

proceedings in question and pay it over to the writ petitioners. In addition to

that, the Writ Court has directed the above said Tahsildar to pay the costs

quantified in a sum of Rs.2000/- (Rupees two thousand only) from out of the

pocket to each of the petitioners,within a period of 15 days from the date of

receipt of production of a copy of the order.

2. The Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to

withdraw the proposed land acquisition belonging to the writ petitioners in

S.No.64/2B2, 64/2B3, 64/2C and 66 to the extent of 4.32 acres and 5 acres

in Reddipatti Village, Oothangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District and to release

the lands of the petitioners from acquisition proceedings.

3. The writ appeal and the writ petition are inter related with regard to

the proceedings for acquisition of the above said lands. Hence, the matters

were taken together for joint hearing and are disposed by way of this

common judgment.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

4. As far as the Writ Appeal No.1623 of 2018 is concerned, a perusal

of the grounds appeal shows that aggrieved by the one of the directions to

the concerned Tahsildar, directing to pay cost of Rs.2,000/- to each writ

petitioners, this appeal has been filed by the Government. In sofar as the

other direction to the Special Tahsildar, viz., to verify as to the ownership

of the writ petitioners in respect of the lands and the survey numbers

furnished in the writ petition and withdraw the compensation amount that

has been deposited in respect of the land acquisition proceedings in

question and pay it over to the writ petitioners is concerned, the appellant/

Department is no way prejudiced by this direction. Therefore, the challenge

is only as against the order for payment of costs. But, in our view, after

discussing the matter elaborately, the Writ Court has passed the above order

and hence, it does not require for any interference by this Court. Therefore,

this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

5. As for as the writ petition in W.P.No.15427/2010 is concerned, the

learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this

Court to withdraw the writ petition and to that effect, she has also made an

endorsement. Further, she seeks liberty to approach the authorities

concerned to seek remedy, in the light of the order passed by this Court in

W.P.No.4105/2003 dated 21.01.2009.

5.1. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the

learned counsel for the appellant, the writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn. No cots. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is

closed. Liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to seek remedy before the

authorities concerned.

                                                                            (D.K.K.J.)         (P.B.B.J.)

                                                                                    18.07.2023

                     Internet: Yes/No
                     Index : Yes/No
                     mst







https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                              W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and
                                                                                 W.P.No.15427 of 2010




                     To

1. The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Corporation of Industrial Development, Greenways Road, Chennai.

3. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

4. The District Collector, Dharmapuri District.

5. The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District.

6. The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri District.

7. The Special Tahsildar (LA), TACID Phase II Office, Pochampalli, Uthangarai Taluk.

8. The Chief Administrative Officer/Construction, Southern Railway, Office of CAO, Construction, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.

and P. B.BALAJI, J.

mst

W.A.No.1623 of 2018 and W.P.No.15427 of 2010

18.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter