Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8440 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023
1/4 W.A.No.1375/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :: 17-07-2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR
W.A.No.1375 of 2021
The Management,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
(Madurai Cottam-3) Limited,
rep.by its Managing Director,
Nesamani Nagar,
Ranithottam, Nagercoil,
Kanyakumari District. ... Appellant
-vs-
1.A.Mohan
2.The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Tirunelveli. ... Respondents
Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order,
dated 23.04.2019, passed in W.P.No.25637 of 2003 on the file of this Court.
For Appellant : Mr.Ramanlal,
Addl.Advocate General,
assisted by Mr.C.Gouthamaraj.
For Respondent 1 : Mrs.Meenakshi for Mr.K.Suresh
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
2/4 W.A.No.1375/2021
JUDGMENT
(By S.Vaidyanathan,J.)
Pursuant to the orders of this Court, dated 12.07.2023, Managing Director
of the appellant Corporation has appeared before the Court through online and
submitted two options, they being one as to the payment of 50% of back-wages from
1994 to 2009 and the other to pay full wages from the date of Award till the date of
reinstatement in the year 2009.
2. Taking note of the submission of the Managing Director, the order of the
learned single Judge is modified into one of full wages from the date of Award till the
date of reinstatement. First respondent - employee would not be entitled to back-wages
from the date of dismissal till the date of Award. Though normal rule is to grant 100%
back-wages on reinstatement, Courts have drawn exception that back-wages are not
automatic.
3. It is represented by Mrs.Meenakshi, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent employee, that the employee has been reinstated, has attained
superannuation and been drawing pension. However, according to her, continuity of
service has not been granted.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4 W.A.No.1375/2021
4. Mr.C.Gouthamaraj, learned counsel for the appellant Corporation, would
submit that the employee has been extended the benefit of continuity of service and now
drawing pension.
5. As the question of reinstatement is not in dispute and that continuity of
service alone is in dispute, if continuity of service is not granted, the employee would be
entitled to the same as if there is no order of dismissal in the eye of law. Back-wages for
the period from the date of dismissal till the date of reinstatement alone are deprived. We
reiterate that the employee shall be given continuity of service by taking into account the
entire service as a notional one and, if continuity of service is not given, back-wages
shall be paid from the date of Award till the date of superannuation and subsequent
revision carried out for higher pension.
6. Writ Appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the
connected C.M.P.No.8587 of 2021 is closed.
Index : Yes/No (S.V.N.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.)
Internet : Yes/No 17-07-2023
dixit
To
The Presiding Officer,
Labour Court,
Tirunelveli.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4/4 W.A.No.1375/2021
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.
AND
K.RAJASEKAR,J.
dixit
W.A.No.1375 of 2021
17-07-2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!