Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Indian Bank vs The Assistant Commissioner ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 8426 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8426 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 July, 2023

Madras High Court
Indian Bank vs The Assistant Commissioner ... on 17 July, 2023
                                                                   W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020




                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                               DATED: 17.07.2023

                                                   CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY

                                           W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020
                                                     and
                                     W.M.P.(MD)Nos.14409 and 14411 of 2020
                     Indian Bank,
                     Stressed Assets Management,
                     Branch Chennai.
                     (Formerly Allahabad Bank
                     Purasawakkam Branch),
                     2nd Floor, No.55, Ethiraj Salai,
                     Egmore, Chennai-600 008,
                     No.100-101, East Avani Moola Street,
                     Madurai – 625 001,
                     represented by its Assistant
                       General Manager.                                   ... Petitioner
                                                      vs.
                     1.The Assistant Commissioner (S.T.)(FAC),
                       Sales Tax Department,
                       Tiruparankundram Circle,
                       Madurai.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/10
                                                              W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020




                     2.The Assistant Commissioner,
                       Commissioner Tax Department,
                       Tiruparankundram Circle,
                       Madurai.
                     3.The Joint 1 Sub-Registrar,
                       Madurai South, Madurai.
                     4.M/s.K.S.Patel and Sons,
                       represented by its Managing Partner,
                       Nathu K.Patel,
                       No.1/4, Vamadam Road,
                       Tennur, Trichy-620 017.
                     5.M/s.Patel Enterprises,
                       represented by its Managing Partner,
                       Gopal K.Patel,
                       No.1/4, Vamadam Road,
                       Tennur, Trichy – 620 017.
                     6.M/s.Sridhar Wood Industries,
                       represented by its Managing Partner,
                       Hasmukh S.Patel,
                       No.1/4, Vamadam Road,
                       Tennur, Trichy-620 017.
                     7.Shivgan K.Patel
                     8.Dinesh S.Patel
                     9.Nathu K.Patel




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     2/10
                                                                     W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020




                     10.Gopal K.Patel
                     11.M/s.Anantha Poly Products Private Limited,
                        represented by its Managing Director,
                       A.Sundaralingam,
                       117-118, SIDCO Industrial Estate,
                       Kappalur, Madurai-625 008.                            ... Respondents
                     (R11 is impleaded, vide Court order,
                     dated 23.12.2021 in W.M.P.(MD)No.18737
                     of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020)


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the
                     records pertaining to the proceedings of the respondents 1 and 2 made in
                     Roc No.664/2017/A3, dated 02.08.2018 and Na.Ka.No.664/2017/A3/,
                     dated 30.07.2019, calling upon the 3rd respondent to notify attachment in
                     relation to the properties subject to prior mortgage with the petitioner
                     Bank and to quash the same and consequently, to direct the 3 rd
                     respondent to cancel/delete the encumbrance notified as Doc.No.L40 of
                     2018 and Doc.No.L58 of 2019 from its file.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     3/10
                                                                            W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020




                                        For Petitioner    : M/s.Aiyar and Dolia
                                        For R1 to 3       : Mr.B.Saravanan
                                                            Additional Government Pleader
                                        For R9            : No appearance
                                        For R11           : Mr.J.Hariharan
                                                            for M/s.KV Law Firm
                                                             *****
                                                          ORDER

This writ petition is filed for writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to

call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the respondents 1

and 2, dated 02.08.2018 and dated 30.07.2019, calling upon the 3 rd

respondent to notify attachment in relation to the properties subject to

prior mortgage with the petitioner Bank and to quash the same and

consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to cancel/delete the

encumbrance notified as Doc.No.L40 of 2018 and Doc.No.L58 of 2019

from its file.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

2. The respondents 4 to 10 stood as guarantors for the credit

facilities availed by M/s.Prabhat International Limited from the

petitioner bank. They executed agreement and created a mortgage over

the immovable properties. The debtor failed to repay the loan. The

petitioner Bank initiated proceedings in SARFASI for a claim of Rs.

42,01,81,972.20/- as on 31.08.2016. Thereafter, the property was

brought to sale and steps were taken to conduct auction on several

occasion and finally e-auction was conducted on 20.09.2021 and the 11th

respondent who is impleaded in this writ petition was the successful

bidder. The sale certificate was issued on 04.12.2021. In the meanwhile,

the petitioner Bank approached the respondents to release the

encumbrance entered in the 3rd respondent office.

3. The contention of the petitioner Bank is that the attachment by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

the Commercial Tax Department was made on 02.08.2018 which is

subsequent to mortgage. The mortgage was mortgage was created on

25.04.2013 and registered on 08.07.2013 in Document No.5363 of 2013.

Hence, the petitioner is having 1st charge over the property, since the

mortgage is prior to attachment. The issue whether the Crown liability

(payment of Tax to government) or the Bank will have the 1st charge over

the property is decided by the several judgments passed by the Hon'ble

Division Bench of this Court, wherein it is held if the mortgage is prior

to the attachment by the Tax authorities, then the bank will have 1st

charge over the property. The following judgments are relevant:

i.Assistant Commissioner (CT) V. Indian Overseas Bank 2016 (6)

CTC 769 (Full Bench)

ii.W.P.(MD)No.12643 of 2020 dated 15.04.2021 (DB)

iii.W.P.(MD)No.19684 of 2019 dated 21.09.2022 (DB)

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

iv. W.P.(MD)No.15960 of 2020 dated 19.01.2021 (Single Judge)

Therefore, it is well settled principle of law that the Bank has a priority

over all the debts and the government dues. The Hon’ble Full Bench

(referred supra) has held that on conjoint reading of Section 26-E of the

Sarfaesi Act and Section 31(b) of the Recovery of Debt Due to Bank and

Financial Institutions Act, 1993, it is the Secured Creditor, who has a

priority to realize the debt over all the other government debts and

unsecured creditors.

4. Following the judgments cited supra this Court is of the

considered opinion that the petitioner Bank has 1st charge over the

property and not the Commercial Tax Department, i.e., respondents 1 and

2. The 3rd respondent is directed to remove the encumbrance which is

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

entered against Commercial Tax Department and the petitioner is entitled

to the consequential relief as well.

5. With the above said observation and directions, the writ petition

is allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions

are closed.

                     Index : Yes / No                                               17.07.2023
                     Internet : Yes
                     NCC      : Yes / No

                     Tmg




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

                                                                 W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020




                     To

1.The Assistant Commissioner (S.T.)(FAC), Sales Tax Department, Tiruparankundram Circle, Madurai.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Commissioner Tax Department, Tiruparankundram Circle, Madurai.

3.The Joint 1 Sub-Registrar, Madurai South, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

S.SRIMATHY, J Tmg

W.P.(MD)No.17222 of 2020

17.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter