Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8308 Mad
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2023
Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 &
C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 14.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tr.C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 &
C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
R.Subhalakshmi ... Petitioner
Vs.
M.Vishnuvardhanen ...Respondent
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the
Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the case bearing H.M.O.P.No.25 of
2023 on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore and transfer the same to
the file of the Family Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr. R.Chandrasudan
For Respondent : Mr.S.Sekar
ORDER
The present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under
Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the case bearing
H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2023 on the file of the Family Court, Coimbatore and
transfer the same to the file of the Family Court, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:-
(i) The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband and
their marriage was solemnised on 08.12.2021, by giving 25 sovereigns of
gold jewels, silver articles and house hold articles as sridhana to the
respondent and the same are lying with the respondent's family and the
entire marriage expenses were borne by the parents of the petitioner. At
the time of marriage, it was represented by the respondent that he is
employed at Dubai and will take necessary arrangement to process VISA
and setup matrimonial home at Dubai. Further, the petitioner and the
respondent lived together only for 12 days and the respondent proceeded
to abroad and the petitioner was tortured and thrown away from the
matrimonial house on 13.03.2022. Left with no other alternative, the
petitioner proceeded to her parents house at Tirunelveli.
(ii) Suppressing the facts, all of a sudden, the respondent has
preferred the H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2023 for divorce on the ground of cruelty
with malafide allegations. The distance between the Family Court,
Coimbatore to Family Court, Tirunelveli is nearly 400 kms and the
petitioner's parents could not accompany the petitioner on account of their
age and age old ailments. Further, the petitioner is not working anywhere
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
and depending on the meager income of the petitioner's father to sustain
their livelihood, hence this petition.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the
respondent is well aware of the practical difficulty of the petitioner to face
proceedings and therefore, has moved this petition. Further, the petitioner
is unemployed and do not possess sufficient money even to bear meager
travelling expenses.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also contends that no
prejudice would be caused to the respondent if the above Original Petition
is transferred from Family Court, Coimbatore to Family Court, Tirunelveli,
since the respondent is residing at overseas and at any event, the
respondent is to be represented through power agent. That apart, the
family members of the respondent are powerful persons in the locality and
the respondent's father is a bar member of legal fraternity at Coimbatore
and that the petitioner's parents are aged and could not accompany the
petitioner for all the hearing, hence seeks to transfer the Original Petition.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent filed a
detailed counter stating that unable to bear the torture of the petitioner the
respondent has preferred H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2023 for divorce. Further, on
18.02.2023, the respondent and his family members went to a temple at
Timmachipuram and parked the four wheeler outside the temple, the four
persons attached with the petitioner smashed the car and took away the
cell phone from the car and the said cell phone contains all the misdeeds
committed by the petitioner. Immediately, the respondent lodged a
complaint with Lalapet Police Station and police officials received the
complaint and issued CSR No.88 of 2023 to the respondent.
6. That apart, the learned counsel for the respondent also submits
that if the petition is transferred to Tirunelveli, the petitioner can do anything
and the petitioner would assault the respondent during the course of
hearing the case at Tirunelveli, thereby seeks police protection.
7. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the
documents placed on record.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
8. It is well settled law that whenever, the transfer application is filed
in matrimonial disputes, the convenience of the wife shall be given
preference, as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Judgments
reported in 2008 (9) SCC 353 [Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi and another Vs.
Dharmendra Kumar Gupta] and AIR 2002 SC 396 [Sumita Singh Vs.
Kumar Sanjay and another].
9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and taking
into account the Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as cited supra,
coupled with the fact that the petitioner is facing financial difficulties to
attend the court proceedings at Coimbatore and is depending only on her
aged parents, in the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to allow this
petition. Accordingly, the H.M.O.P.No.25 of 2023 pending on the file of
Family Court, Coimbatore is withdrawn and transferred to the Family Court,
Tirunelveli. Further, taking note of the fact that the persons attached with
the petitioner smashed the car of the respondent and grabbed the cell
phone and with regard to the said incident, a complaint has been lodged
with the Lalapet Police Station and CSR has been assigned and the
respondent also apprehends assault by the petitioner, this Court is inclined
to grant police Protection to the respondent / husband.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
With the above observation, the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous
Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is
closed. The respondent is permitted to approach the concerned
Jurisdictional Police to provide police protection at his own cost and
accordingly, the Concerned Jurisdictional Police shall provide police
protection as and when required. No costs.
14.07.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking order / non speaking order ssd
To
1. The Family Court, Coimbatore
2. The Family Court, Tirunelveli
3. The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Tr C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.,
ssd
Tr.C.M.P.No.183 of 2023 & C.M.P.No.4108 of 2023
14.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!