Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8261 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2023
W.A.No.3576 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.3576 of 2019 and
C.M.P.No.22944 of 2019
1.The Secretary to Government,
School Education Department,
Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Director of School Education,
College Road, Chennai – 600 006.
3.The Chief Educational Officer,
Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.
4.The Headmaster,
Government Boys Higher Secondary School,
Velampatthy – 635 204
Krishnagiri District. ... Appellants
Vs.
K.Gowri Sankar ... Respondent
Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, praying
to set aside the order dated 25.02.2014 in W.P.No.5538 of 2014.
For Appellants : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar
Special Government Pleader
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Respondent : Mr.S.Kamadevan
W.A.No.3576 of 2019
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.KUMARESH BABU, J.)
This intra-Court appeal has been filed challenging the order of the
learned Single Judge dated 25.02.2014 in W.P.No.5538 of 2014 wherein
the learned Judge had directed the appellant Department to grant third
incentive increment to the respondent herein.
2. It is submitted, across the Bar that, the issue that arises in the
present writ appeal is no longer res integra and the same had already
been resolved by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in the matter of
Government of Tamil Nadu and R.Subramani and others in
W.A.No.3674 of 2019 etc. batch dated 29.04.2022, wherein the Hon'ble
Full Bench has held that the teachers are only entitled to two incentive
increments only and they are not entitled for third incentive increment. In
such view of the matter, a direction issued under the impugned order to
the appellants to grant third incentive increment would be against the
dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court.
3. It is pertinent to note that a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court,
where one of us (K.B.J.) is a party, had an occasion to consider the same https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.3576 of 2019
issue in the case of R.Rajamanickam V. The Secretary to Government,
School Education Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai – 9 and 3
others in W.P.No.16000 of 2015 on 10.10.2022 and followed the view
taken by the Hon'ble Full Bench.
4. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Single
Judge dated 25.02.2014 is set aside and accordingly, the Writ Appeal is
allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.S.K., J.) (K.B., J.)
13.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
Sgl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.3576 of 2019
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.
And
K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
Sgl
W.A.No.3576 of 2019
13.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!