Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Media One Global Entertainment ... vs Prakashmal And Sons Huf
2023 Latest Caselaw 8258 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8258 Mad
Judgement Date : 13 July, 2023

Madras High Court
Media One Global Entertainment ... vs Prakashmal And Sons Huf on 13 July, 2023
                                                           C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 13.07.2023

                                                      CORAM :

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                    C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017
                                   and C.M.P.Nos.16145, 16146, 16147 & 16148 of 2017


                     Media One Global Entertainment Limited
                     Rep. by its Director
                     No.26/13, Razia House,
                     Saraswathy Street,
                     Mahalinghapuram,
                     Chennai-600 034                                  ... Petitioner in all CRPs

                                                          vs.

                     1.Prakashmal and sons HUF
                       Rep by its Manager & Kartha
                       Prakashmal Jain
                       No.1088, Poonamallee High Road
                       Vimalachal Apartments
                       Vepry, Chennai-600 007.        ... R1 in CRP.3471 of 2017

                     2.Parag P.Jain                             ... R1 in CRP.3472 of 2017

                     3.Minal V.Shah                             ... R1 in CRP.3473 of 2017

                     4.Swathi A.Shah                            ... R1 in CRP.3473 of 2017

                     5.J.Muralimanohar                          ... R2 in all CRPs




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     1/5
                                                          C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017

                     Prayer in CRP(NPD)No.3471 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 227
                     of the Constitution of India against the decreetal and fair order dated
                     24.10.2016 made in I.A.No.12458 of 2016 in O.S.No.3055 of 2016 on
                     the file of the XI Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai,


                     Prayer in CRP(NPD)No.3472 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 227
                     of the Constitution of India against the decreetal and fair order dated
                     24.10.2016 made in I.A.No.12461 of 2016 in O.S.No.3058 of 2016 on
                     the file of the XI Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai,


                     Prayer in CRP(NPD)No.3473 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 227
                     of the Constitution of India against the decreetal and fair order dated
                     24.10.2016 made in I.A.No.12462 of 2016 in O.S.No.3060 of 2016 on
                     the file of the XI Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai,


                     Prayer in CRP(NPD)No.3474 of 2017: Petition filed under Article 227
                     of the Constitution of India against the decreetal and fair order dated
                     24.10.2016 made in I.A.No.12852 of 2016 in O.S.No.3059 of 2016 on
                     the file of the XI Asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai,

                                  (In all CRPs)

                                  For Petitioner:    Mr.T.T.Ravichandran

                                  For Respondents: Mr.T.Srikanth (for R1)




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     2/5
                                                                C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017

                                                      COMMON ORDER

                                  The petitioners are the defendants in the respective suits. The suits

                     have been filed for recovery of money based on pronotes. The petitioners

                     claim that the interest rate has been tampered with by the plaintiff prior

                     to the presentation of the plaint. They would also say that there is no

                     privity of contract between the plaintiff and the first defendant.

                                  2.I have heard Mr.T.T.Ravichandran, learned counsel appearing

                     for the petitioner and Mr.T.Srikanth, learned counsel appearing for the

                     first respondent.

                                  3.This is an application for leave to defend the suit and in such a

                     suit, unless and until the defence is absolutely moonshine, the parties are

                     entitled to defend the suit by grant of leave. Therefore, the judgment of

                     the Supreme Court in Mechelec Engineers and Manufacturers v.

                     M/s.Basic Equipment Corporation (1976 SCC (4) 687), held that unless

                     and until the defence is absolutely untenable, leave should not normally

                     granted. Here is the case where the transaction in favour of the plaintiff

                     have all been by way of bank transfer.

                                  4.The defendant disputes only the interest amount payable, but has

                     not disputed the principal. Therefore, I feel interest of justice will be

                     served, if the defendant is directed to deposit the principal amount in
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     3/5
                                                              C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017

                     each of the suits to the credit of respective cases. On such deposit, leave

                     to defend applications are allowed. The said deposit of the principal

                     amount shall be made within a period of six weeks from the date of

                     receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the defendant is entitled to file

                     a written statement and contest the suit on merits. In case, the principal

                     amounts are not deposited within the aforesaid period, the revisions shall

                     stand dismissed.

                                  5.With the above directions, these Civil Revision Petitions are

                     allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are

                     closed.

                                                                                              13.07.2023
                     Index:Yes/No
                     Speaking/Non-speaking order
                     Neutral Citation:Yes/No
                     vs

                     To

                     The XI Asst. Judge,
                     City Civil Court, Chennai,




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                     4/5
                                                  C.R.P.(NPD) Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017



                                                      V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

vs

C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3471, 3472, 3473 & 3474 of 2017 and C.M.P.Nos.16145, 16146, 16147 & 16148 of 2017

13.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter