Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaliyaperumal vs Kolanjinathan
2023 Latest Caselaw 8092 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8092 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2023

Madras High Court
Kaliyaperumal vs Kolanjinathan on 11 July, 2023
                                                                             CRP(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED: 11.07.2023

                                                        CORAM:

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                          C.R.P.(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019
                                   and C.M.P.Nos.13871, 13874, 13876 & 13894 of 2019


           1.Kaliyaperumal
           2.Rajendran
           3.Rajadurai                                                               ... Petitioners in
                                                                                 all the three CRPs.

                                                           Vs.


           1.Kolanjinathan
           2.Dakshinamurthy
           3.Baskaran                                                            ... Respondents in
                                                                                all the three CRPs.


           Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the

           Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 21.02.2019 made in

           I.A.Nos.402, 401 & 403 of 2018 in O.S.No.308 of 2015 on the file of the Additional

           District Munsif Court, Cuddalore.



                                      In all the three CRPs.

                                      For Petitioner   : Mr.J.Pradeep

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


           1/5
                                                                              CRP(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019


                                        COMMON ORDER
                     These revisions arise against an order passed by the learned Additional District

           Munsif at Cuddalore in dismissing the applications filed in I.A.Nos.401 to 403 of

           2018 in O.S.No.308 of 2015.



                     2. The       defendants 1, 2 & 5 are the revision petitioners. They had filed

           applications in I.A.No.401 of 2018 to re-open the case to recall D.W.1, the 1st

           defendant, I.A.No.402 of 2018 to mark the document and I.A.No.403 of 2018 to

           receive the document. The document that sought to be marked was the judgment and

           decree in O.S.No.1 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif Court-cum-Judicial

           Magistrate's Court, Valangaiman, dated 31.08.2018. The grounds on which the

           applications were dismissed, were on two fold:

                     (i) The averment was not stated in the written statement and

                     (ii) It amounts to filling up the lacunae in the case.



                     3. In so far as the first ground is concerned, the demand by the trial Court is

           impossible, because the written statement was filed in September 2016, whereas the

           decree in O.S.No.1 of 2018 came to be passed in the year 2018. The 1st defendant

           could not have pleaded about the decree and judgment in the suit, as on the date on

           which he filed written statement, the said judgment and decree was not in existence.

           On the second ground, it amounts to filling up the lacunae, the matter is still pending
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


           2/5
                                                                               CRP(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019


           trial. The Code of Civil Procedure is not a legislation meant to punish litigants. The

           trial Court is the First Court of law and fact and whatever evidence is available to a

           litigant should be brought forth before that Court. By giving an opportunity to the

           petitioners, no prejudice would have been caused to either party, because the

           document that relied upon is the judgment and decree of the regularly constituted

           Court. The question of relevancy for filing the document etc., always falls within the

           scope of marshalling of evidence. Therefore, I do not need to punish the petitioners

           for producing the document, which has come into existence after presentation of the

           plaint and after filing written statement, in fact it might have a vital impact, as pleaded

           by the defendants, on the outcome of the suit.



                     4. In fine,

                     (i) The orders dated 21.02.2019 passed in I.A.Nos.401 to 403 of 2018 in

           O.S.No.308 of 2015 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore,

           are set aside and the Civil Revision Petitions are allowed.

                     (ii) The trial Court is directed to give an opportunity to the revision petitioners

           on 16.08.2023. On that day, the petitioners will examine the 1 st defendant/DW1, mark

           the document and close his side. Since the permission is granted only to get the

           judgment and decree in the suit, there need not be lengthy cross-examination for the

           said purpose. If the learned counsel for the plaintiffs requests time to cross-examine,

           the Court below can grant him an opportunity.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


           3/5
                                                                        CRP(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019


                     (iii) In any event, the evidence of D.W.1 shall be completed on or before

           31.08.2023 and the judgment in the suit O.S.No.308 of 2015 shall be pronounced by

           30.09.2023. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.




                                                                                        11.07.2023
           Index:Yes/No
           Speaking Order :Yes/No
           Neutral Citation:Yes/No

           Note:Issue order copy on 11.07.2023

           kj



           To

           The Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis


           4/5
                                                              CRP(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019




                                                      V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.

Kj

C.R.P.(PD)Nos.2153 to 2155 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.13871, 13874, 13876 & 13894 of 2019

11.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter