Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8020 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2023
C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
and C.M.P.Nos.8328 of 2021 & 5877 of 2023
National Insurance Company Ltd.,
No.169, Anna Salai,
Chennai – 600 002. ...Appellant
Vs
1.P.Arumugam
2.O.Kothandam
3.P.Geetha ... Respondents
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award and decree dated 05.03.2020 made in
M.C.O.P.No.3005 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,
(In the VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.D.Bhaskaran
For R1 : Mr.Leelesh Sundaram
for M/s.Nathan & Associates
For R2 : No Appearance
1/6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
JUDGMENT
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed against the award and
decree dated 05.03.2020 made in M.C.O.P.No.3005 of 2012 on the file of the
Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (In the VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai.
2.The 1st respondent/claimant filed M.C.O.P.No.3005 of 2012, on the file
of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (In the VI Court of Small Causes),
Chennai, claiming a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- as compensation for the injury
sustained by him.
3.The Tribunal considering the pleadings, oral and documentary
evidence, held that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving by
the 2nd respondent/driver of the lorry and directed the appellant/Insurance
Company to pay a sum of Rs.14,40,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5%
as compensation to the 1st respondent/claimant.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
4.Aggrieved over the award passed by the Tribunal, the
appellant/Insurance Company filed the present appeal challenging the quantum
of compensation.
5.Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance Company would
submit that the Tribunal in the absence of any material evidence to prove the
loss of income has awarded a sum of Rs.13,58,640/- towards functional
disability by applying multiplier method, which has to be set aside. Further, the
1st respondent/claimant has erred in granting a sum of Rs.14,40,074/- as
compensation as against the claim of Rs.1,50,000/- without proper adjudication.
6.Learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent/claimant brought the
1st respondent/claimant before this Court as per the order of this Court dated
06.07.2023 and submitted that the 1st respondent/claimant was working as
painter before the accident. After that, for the past 13 years, he was not able to
do any work and he is often getting fits. He would also submit that the 1st
respondent/claimant cannot walk without any aid and he prayed to pass
appropriate orders.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
7.Though the learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance
Company initially argued that the Tribunal has erred in awarding a huge sum as
against the claim amount of Rs.1,50,000/-, after noticing the disability sustained
by the 1st respondent/claimant, he submitted that the quantum awarded by the
Tribunal is just and fair.
8.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Insurance
Company as well as the 1st respondent/claimant and perused the materials
available on record.
9.Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for either parties and after observing the disability sustained by the 1st
respondent/claimant, this Court feels that since the 1st respondent/claimant
always needs the help of some one to carry on day-to-day activities and cannot
walk without any aid, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and fair.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
10.In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed and the
award of the Tribunal is confirmed. The 5th respondent/Insurance Company is
directed to deposit the entire amount awarded by the Tribunal, along with
interest and cost, less the amount, already deposited if any within a period of
eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. Therafter, the
Tribunal is directed to transfer the award amount to the 1st respondent/claimant
by way of RTGS to his bank account directly, within a period of three weeks
from the deposit being made or from date of furnishing the RTGS particulars by
the 1st respondent/claimant, whichever is later. On such deposit, the 1st
respondent/claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount along
with interest and cost, less the amount if any already withdrawn. No costs.
Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition are closed.
11.07.2023 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No rst
To:
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (In the VI Court of Small Causes), Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J.
rst
C.M.A.No.1598 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.8328 of 2021 & 5877 of 2023
11.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!