Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7997 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 10.07.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.A.(MD)No.1092 of 2014 and
M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014
1.The Director of School Education,
School Education Department, Chennai.
2.The Chief Educational Officer,
Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3.The Head Master,
Government Higher Secondary School,
Tharuvaikulam, Thoothukudi. ... Appellants
Vs.
M.Shanmugakani ... Respondent
PRAYER:- Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set
aside the order, dated 23.07.2014 passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.
6218 of 2014.
For Appellant :Mr.V.Om Prakash
Government Advocate
For Respondents :No Appearance
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.)
The respondent/Writ Petitioner has been consistently absent
both on the earlier occasions as well as today.
2.The Writ Petition has been filed seeking a Mandamus
directing the Headmaster of Government Higher Secondary School,
Tharuvaikulam, Thoothukudi, to disburse salary including past arrears as
per re-fixation order, dated 07.12.2012. The Writ Petition had come to be
allowed on 23.07.2014 on the strength of order dated 07.12.2012.
3.Mr.V.Om Prakash, learned Government Advocate for the
appellant/State has advanced two contentions. Firstly, he would state
that there had been a suppression of the position that order dated
07.12.2012 had been kept in abeyance by order dated 13.02.2013. It was
his case that, had said order dated 13.02.2013 been brought to the notice
of the Court, the Writ Petition would not have been allowed at the first
instance.
2/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
4.The second contention is that this very Writ Petitioner had
been dismissed from service under proceedings in Na.Ka.No.
10141/A2/2007, dated 09.01.2016. The order of dismissal had been
challenged by the Writ Petitioner in W.P(MD)No.1270 of 2016 and by
order dated 23.11.2022, the Writ Petition had come to be allowed. The
impugned order in that Writ Petition was quashed and the respondents
were directed to approve the Writ Petitioner's appointment and disburse
all terminal and monetary benefits as applicable.
5.It is, perhaps, on account order dated 23.11.2022 that the
Writ Petitioner has not thought it necessary to appear and pursue the
present Writ Appeal. In any event, by virtue of that order dated
23.11.2022, nothing further survives in this Writ Appeal and recording
the same, this Writ Appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
[A.S.M.J.,] & [R.V.J.,]
NCC :Yes/No 10.07.2023
Index :Yes/No
Internet :Yes
cmr
3/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.
AND R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.
cmr
W.A.(MD)No.1092 of 2014
10.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!