Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7992 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2023
W.A.No.1453 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.A.No.1453 of 2023
T.Malaithai .. Appellant
Vs.
1. The Central Information Commissioner
Central Information Commission
R.No.326, C – Wing, 2nd Floor
August Kranthi Bhavan
Bhikaji Vcama Placa
New Delhi – 110 066.
2. The State Information Commissioner
Tamil Nadu Information Commission
No.2, Theagaraya Salai
Near Aalai Amman Koil
Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
3. The Public Information Officer cum
Commissioner of Police
Palayamkottai, Thiruvelveli. .. Respondents
Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the
order passed in W.P.No.59 of 2018 dated 13.01.2020.
Page 1 of 6
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.1453 of 2023
For the Appellant : Ms.R.S.Maitreya
For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar
State Government Pleader
assisted by Mrs.R.Anitha
Special Government Pleader
for R2 & R3
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard Ms.R.S.Maitreya, learned counsel for the appellant and
Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader assisted by
Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Special Government Pleader for respondents
2 and 3.
2. The appellant is challenging the order passed by the
learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition, where, the
petitioner / appellant is challenging the order passed by the State
Information Commissioner, thereby rejecting the application of the
petitioner / appellant for information.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1453 of 2023
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant is independently entitled for the information under the
provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The reason given
is erroneous.
4. The husband of the appellant has sought for the
information in the year 2015 with regard to the selection process to
the post of Police Constable Grade II, conducted in the year
1989-1990. The information was given that he had not duly passed
the examination and that the other information sought by him are
the informations relevant to the period 25 and 17 years ago and
since the documents were destroyed by that time, the same could
not be provided.
5. Now, again the wife asking the same information is
certainly not warranted. The selection process had taken place
thirty three years back.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1453 of 2023
6. In the light of that, no error has been committed by the
learned Single Judge. The writ appeal, as such, is dismissed. There
will be no order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.)
10.07.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
drm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1453 of 2023
To
1. The Central Information Commissioner Central Information Commission R.No.326, C – Wing, 2nd Floor August Kranthi Bhavan Bhikaji Vcama Placa New Delhi – 110 066.
2. The State Information Commissioner Tamil Nadu Information Commission No.2, Theagaraya Salai Near Aalai Amman Koil Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.
3. The Public Information Officer cum Commissioner of Police Palayamkottai, Thiruvelveli.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.1453 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.
(drm)
W.A.No.1453 of 2023
10.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!