Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7974 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2023
W.A.No.2618 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
W.A.No.2618 of 2019
and C.M.P.Nos.16823 & 16824 of 2019
Dr.M.Ganesan .... Appellant
Vs
1.The Chancellor
Tamil University
Raj Bhavan
Guindy, Chennai 600 022.
2.Government of Tamil Nadu
Rep.by its Secretary
Tamil Development and Information
Department, Fort St.George
Chennai 600 009.
3.Search Committee
Rep.by its Chairman
Tamil Univesity, No.422, 2nd Main Road
Sri Kapaleeswarar Nagar, Neelangarai
Chennai 600 115.
4.Tamil University
Rep.by its Registrar
Trichy Main Road
Thanjavur – 613 010.
5.Dr.G.Balasubramanian .... Respondents
Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.No.2618 of 2019
dated 18.6.2019 made in W.P.No.31828 of 2018.
For Appellant : Ms.Parvin Banu L.
For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar
Special Government Pleader-for R2
Mr.Sivavarthanan – for R4
Mr.Senthil Kumaran – for R5
No appearance – for RR 1 and 3
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)
The very challange that has been made before the Writ Court in
W.P.No.31828 of 2018 was the appointment of the 5th respondent as the Vice
Chancellor of the 4th respondent University.
2. The said writ petition was dismissed by the order of the Writ Court dated
18.06.2019. Challenging the same, the present intra court appeal has been
directed.
3. Today, when the writ appeal is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
for the appellant submitted that though the term of office of the 5th respondent
which started from 05.10.2018 was over by 04.10.2021 and thereafter a new
incumbent has come in the place of the 5th respondent at the 4th respondent
University as Vice Chancellor, it is for the Court to take a decision on the issue
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2618 of 2019
raised in the writ petition followed by the present appeal academically.
4. We have also heard the learned counsel for the 4th respondent University
and the learned counsel for the 5th respondent.
5. Since the very term of office is over, the issue raised in the writ petition
which has been negatived by the learned Judge can be agitated by the appellant
or any other person aggrieved at an appropriate time later. Therefore, for that
purpose, this writ appeal need not be kept pending. In that view of the matter,
this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous
petitions are also dismissed.
(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B.,J,.) 10.07.2023
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No KST
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2618 of 2019
To
1.The Chancellor Tamil University Raj Bhavan Guindy, Chennai 600 022.
2.Government of Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Secretary Tamil Development and Information Department, Fort St.George Chennai 600 009.
3.Search Committee Rep.by its Chairman Tamil Univesity, No.422, 2nd Main Road Sri Kapaleeswarar Nagar, Neelangarai Chennai 600 115.
4.Tamil University Rep.by its Registrar Trichy Main Road Thanjavur – 613 010.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.2618 of 2019
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.
KST
W.A.No.2618 of 2019
10.07.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!