Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Rajarathinam
2023 Latest Caselaw 7858 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7858 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2023

Madras High Court
The State Of Tamil Nadu vs Rajarathinam on 7 July, 2023
                                                                           Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  Dated: 07.07.2023

                                                      CORAM

                               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
                                                 AND
                              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

                                           Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017 &
                                               CMP.No.2223 of 2018


                     1.The State of Tamil Nadu
                       Rep., by its Secretary to Govt.,
                       Environment and Forest,
                       Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

                     2.The Secretary to Govt.,
                       The State of Tamil Nadu,
                       Environment and Forest (FR2) Dept.,
                       Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.

                     3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
                       15, Jeenis Road, Panagal Building,
                       Saidapet, Chennai -600 015.        ... Appellants

                                                          Vs

                     1.Rajarathinam
                     2.S.Jayaraj
                     3.I.Sekar
                     4.G.Tamilzhselvi
                     5.G.Chitra
                     6.M.Dhanam

                     Page No.1/5


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                  Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017


                     7.J.Ayyammal
                     8.M.Rajamani
                     9.S.Krishnaveni
                     10.S.Shyamala
                     11.B.Rathna
                     12.C.Vasantha
                     13.M.Parimala
                     14.S.Malini
                     15.K.Prakash                              ... Respondents

                     PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent against the
                     order dated 26.11.2013 made in W.P.No.18383 of 2012.

                                  For Appellants   : Mr.K.V.Sanjeev Kumar Spl.G.P

                                  For Respondent   : Mr.R.Jayaprakash for RR1,4 to 7, R9 to R15

                                               No Appearance for RR2, 3 & 8



                                                         JUDGMENT

(Order of the Court was made by Mr.R.SURESHKUMAR.,J.)

Though the appeal has been directed against the order passed by the

Writ Court dated 26.11.2013 in W.P.No.18383 of 2012, where the Writ

Court allowed the said Writ Petition filed by the private respondents herein

under which they were directed to be absorbed as regular employees like

Forest Watcher by way of creating supernumerary post, today when the

Page No.2/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017

appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr.R.Jayaprakash, learned counsel appearing

for the private respondents on instructions would submit that during the

pendency of the Writ Appeal, the private respondents pursuant to the order

passed by the Writ Court which is impugned herein, were taken back and

they have been appointed as such. Therefore, the prayer sought for in these

Writ Appeals has become infructuous.

2. The said statement given by the learned counsel appearing for the

private respondents is taken on record, which could not be controverted by

the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants.

Considering this aspect, we are inclined to dismiss this Writ Appeal having

become infructuous and accordingly the Writ Appeal is dismissed as

infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

However there shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                         (R.S.K.,J.)            (K.B., J.)
                                                                              07.07.2023
                     Index: Yes/No

Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No

Page No.3/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017

pbn

Page No.4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017

R.SURESH KUMAR., J.

and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.

pbn

Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017

07.07.2023

Page No.5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter