Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7858 Mad
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2023
Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 07.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017 &
CMP.No.2223 of 2018
1.The State of Tamil Nadu
Rep., by its Secretary to Govt.,
Environment and Forest,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
2.The Secretary to Govt.,
The State of Tamil Nadu,
Environment and Forest (FR2) Dept.,
Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.
3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,
15, Jeenis Road, Panagal Building,
Saidapet, Chennai -600 015. ... Appellants
Vs
1.Rajarathinam
2.S.Jayaraj
3.I.Sekar
4.G.Tamilzhselvi
5.G.Chitra
6.M.Dhanam
Page No.1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
7.J.Ayyammal
8.M.Rajamani
9.S.Krishnaveni
10.S.Shyamala
11.B.Rathna
12.C.Vasantha
13.M.Parimala
14.S.Malini
15.K.Prakash ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent against the
order dated 26.11.2013 made in W.P.No.18383 of 2012.
For Appellants : Mr.K.V.Sanjeev Kumar Spl.G.P
For Respondent : Mr.R.Jayaprakash for RR1,4 to 7, R9 to R15
No Appearance for RR2, 3 & 8
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by Mr.R.SURESHKUMAR.,J.)
Though the appeal has been directed against the order passed by the
Writ Court dated 26.11.2013 in W.P.No.18383 of 2012, where the Writ
Court allowed the said Writ Petition filed by the private respondents herein
under which they were directed to be absorbed as regular employees like
Forest Watcher by way of creating supernumerary post, today when the
Page No.2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
appeal is taken up for hearing, Mr.R.Jayaprakash, learned counsel appearing
for the private respondents on instructions would submit that during the
pendency of the Writ Appeal, the private respondents pursuant to the order
passed by the Writ Court which is impugned herein, were taken back and
they have been appointed as such. Therefore, the prayer sought for in these
Writ Appeals has become infructuous.
2. The said statement given by the learned counsel appearing for the
private respondents is taken on record, which could not be controverted by
the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants.
Considering this aspect, we are inclined to dismiss this Writ Appeal having
become infructuous and accordingly the Writ Appeal is dismissed as
infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
However there shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K.,J.) (K.B., J.)
07.07.2023
Index: Yes/No
Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Page No.3/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
pbn
Page No.4/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
R.SURESH KUMAR., J.
and K.KUMARESH BABU.,J.
pbn
Writ Appeal No.1503 of 2017
07.07.2023
Page No.5/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!