Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S.Taj Mohammed vs The Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 7599 Mad

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7599 Mad
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2023

Madras High Court
S.Taj Mohammed vs The Secretary on 5 July, 2023
                                                                            W.P.No.12156 of 2023

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 05.07.2023

                                                        CORAM

                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                                 W.P.No.12156 of 2023

                     S.Taj Mohammed                                     ... Petitioner

                                                          Vs.
                     1. The Secretary,
                        Revenue Department,
                        Secretariat, Fort St. George,
                        Chennai – 600 009.

                     2. The District Collector,
                        Collectorate,
                        Namakkal District – 637 001.

                     3. The Assistant Director,
                        District Land Survey Office,
                        Namakkal District.

                     4. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
                        Namakkal, Namakkal District.

                     5. The Tahsildar,
                        Rasipuram, Namakkal District.

                     6. Muthunayakker
                     7. Chinnusamy
                     8. Thalamayammal
                     9. Thangavel
                     10.Palaniyammal
                     11. Sekar                                          ... Respondents

                     Page 1 of 8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                             W.P.No.12156 of 2023




                     Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for
                     issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 5th respondents to
                     conduct a survey and remove the entries of erstwhile owners and adjacent
                     land owner names of respondents 6 to 11 in Sr.Nos.26/1A1 in Patta No.824
                     to the extent of 2.3/4 cents, Sr.Nos.26/1C and 26/2 in Patta No.655 to the
                     extent of 82 cents, and Sr.No.26/4A1 in Patta No.15281 to the extent of 77
                     cents respectively which is situated at Bodinayakkanpatty, Kendy
                     Rangamanayakkanuur,               Singalanthapuram       Village,    Rasipuram      Taluk,
                     Namakkal District and to issue a separate patta in petitioner name and
                     consider the petitioner's on-line application No.2022422009077 dated
                     22.04.2022 and the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2022.

                                        For Petitioner              : Mr.R.Palaniyappan

                                        For Respondents             : Mr.C.Jayaprakash
                                                                      Government Advocate [R1 to R5]

                                                                      No appearance [R6 to 8 and 10]

                                                                      R9 – Deceased

                                                                      R11- Not Ready in Notice


                                                              ORDER

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the 1st to 5th

respondents to conduct a survey and remove the entries of erstwhile owners

and adjacent land owner names of respondents 6 to 11 in Sr.Nos.26/1A1 in

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

Patta No.824 to the extent of 2.3/4 cents, Sr.Nos.26/1C and 26/2 in Patta

No.655 to the extent of 82 cents, and Sr.No.26/4A1 in Patta No.15281 to the

extent of 77 cents respectively which is situated at Bodinayakkanpatty,

Kendy Rangamanayakkanuur, Singalanthapuram Village, Rasipuram Taluk,

Namakkal District and to issue a separate patta in petitioner name by

considering the petitioner's on-line application No.2022422009077 dated

22.04.2022 and the petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2022.

2. The issues raised in the present writ petition were adjudicated by

this Court in a batch of writ petitions in W.P.No.262 of 2018 [D.Tulasi Vs.

The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri] etc., and batch, and a judgment

was delivered on 09.06.2023 and the relevant paragraphs of the judgment are

extracted hereunder:

“33. In view of the anomalous situation created on account of the inconsistency in dealing with the grievances of the aggrieved persons, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders:

(1) The Commissioner of Land Administration is directed to issue orders to all the competent authorities under his control across the State of Tamil Nadu to maintain registers for

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

entertaining the applications/ representations /appeals filed in a prescribed format by complying with the procedures under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 and the Rules in force. (2) Every such application filed by the aggrieved persons are to be registered in the book of register and serial number has to be assigned in the order of seniority and such seniority assigned must be informed/communicated to the applicants/appellants.

(3) All the applications/appeals by the respective parties are to be taken up for hearing/enquiry in the order of seniority as far as possible and without causing any discrimination amongst the similarly placed applicants/appellants. Priority for hearing/enquiry is to be granted only if the applicant/appellant is able to establish that there is a genuine urgency, which is to be recorded by the Competent authority, while taking up the matter for hearing/enquiry. All other applications/appeals are to be heard and disposed of in the order of seniority.

(4) An enquiry under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 is to be conducted by the competent authorities by following the procedures as contemplated under the Rules and by affording opportunity to the parties. The competent authorities shall refuse to grant unnecessary adjournments to the parties, who all are intending to prolong and protract the matter. Adjournments are to be granted on genuine grounds only by

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

recording the reasons. Casual adjournments of hearing are to be avoided, which would cause prejudice to any one of the party.

(5) All applications / appeals are to be disposed of by the competent authorities within a prescribed time limits stipulated under the Government orders or by the Commissioner of Land Administration. In the event of no time limit, the authorities are expected to pass orders within a reasonable period of time i.e., within a period of six months. (6) The respondents are directed to relegate the parties to the Civil Court of Law, if there is any disputed facts regarding civil rights between the parties exists. (7) The respondents are directed not to entertain applications under the Patta Pass Book Act, if the Civil Suits between the parties are pending before the Court of Law. In such circumstances, the applicants/appellants may be granted liberty to approach the competent authorities only after resolving the issues before the Civil Court of Law. The Authorities are directed to keep the revenue proceedings in abeyance till such time the civil disputes reach finality between the parties.

(8) The Commissioner of Revenue Administration is directed to issue consolidated instructions/circular to all the subordinate officials based on the orders passed by this Court and ensure proper implementation to make the public administration

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

more efficient, since it is a Constitutional mandate. (9) The Higher Authorities are directed to conduct periodical review to ensure that the procedures are followed scrupulously and in the event of any lapses, negligence or dereliction of duty on the part of the authorities, appropriate disciplinary actions are to be initiated under the Service Rules.

(10) The competent authorities are directed to pass speaking orders and communicate the same to all the parties concerned in the manner prescribed under the Rules of Public Administration.”

3. In view of the fact that the case of the petitioner is also similar to

that of the cases (cited supra), the case of the petitioner is also to be

considered on the same line. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed

of. No costs.

05.07.2023

Index : Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes mp

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

To

1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Namakkal District – 637 001.

3. The Assistant Director, District Land Survey Office, Namakkal District.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

5. The Tahsildar, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.12156 of 2023

mp

W.P.No.12156 of 2023

05.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter