Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 915 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2023
W.A.No.100 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.01.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Writ Appeal No.100 of 2023
1. G.Sakthivel
2. S.Tamilselvi .. Appellants
Vs.
The Commissioner of Municipality
Pollachi Municipality
Pollachi. .. Respondent
Prayer: Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order
dated 04.08.2022 made in W.P.No.35560 of 2019.
For the Appellants : Mr.M.Muthappan
For the Respondent : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen
Additional Advocate General I
Assisted by
Mr.B.Anand
JUDGMENT
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.100 of 2023
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
This writ appeal has been directed against the order 04.08.2022
made in W.P.No.35560 of 2019, wherein, the learned Single Judge has
held that the property of the appellants has been assessed on the
basis of the rates applicable to Udumalai Road for several years and
therefore, the said assessment cannot not be altered.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that when the
property in S.Nos.31, 32, 33, 34, T.S.No.221/Part, 222, 223, 224, 225
Part 226, 231/3, 231/4 of Ward 14, Pollachi Town, is located in
between Dr.Munusamy Road and Udumalai Road and that major
portion of the property is in Dr.Munusamy Road, the respondent
Municipality cannot compute tax as per the rate applicable to Udumalai
Road, instead of Dr.Munusamy Road.
3. Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the
appellants, without challenging the correctness of the assessment of
tax for their property by way of an appeal, have come up before this
Court. He further submitted that the appellants have not paid the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.100 of 2023
property tax since 2017 nor challenged the same.
4. Admittedly, there is no dispute with regard to the location of
the property. The respondent has been assessing the property tax
applicable to Udumalai Road for several years and therefore, it is not
open to the appellants to say that the assessment has to be made on
the basis of the market value of the property located in Dr.Munusamy
Road as it is a junction touching the property. Further, the appellants
having paid the tax for the year 2015-16 as per the rate applicable to
Udumalai Road, cannot challenge the same on the ground that it
should be assessed as per the rate applicable to Dr.Munusamy Road.
We do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the learned
Single Judge. Accordingly, the writ appeal fails and the same is
dismissed. No costs. Consequently, CMP No.995 of 2023 is also
dismissed.
(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.)
23.01.2023
Index : Yes/No
Neutral Citation : Yes/No
kpl
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.100 of 2023
To
The Commissioner of Municipality Pollachi Municipality Pollachi.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.No.100 of 2023
T.RAJA, ACJ, and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J
(kpl)
W.A.No.100 of 2023
23.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!