Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 909 Mad
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2023
A.S.No.555 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.01.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
A.S.No.555 of 2013
and M.P.No.1 of 2013
1.B.Dhanapal
2.B.Jhonapark ...Appellants
-Vs-
1.B.Clara
2.B.Yabeth Joseph
3.B.Albert
4.B.Daniel
5.B.Samson
6.B.Thomas
7.B.Mary
8.B.Suseela @ Jayaragini
9.B.Helanmary
10.B.Jakkuleen
11.N.Sebastin @ Govindan
12.Francis ...Respondents
Prayer:- Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 r/w Order 41 and 41-A of C.P.C.,
against the judgment and decree dated 26.03.2013 made in O.S.No.186 of
2010 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Salem.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
1/4
A.S.No.555 of 2013
For Appellants : Mr.T.Sundaravadanam
For R1 to R3, R7 & R8 : Died
For R4 to R6, R9, R11 & R12: No appearance
For R10 : No such Addressee
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.,]
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has filed a Memo dated
12.12.2022. Pursuant to the Memo, it is admitted that the 1st appellant, by name,
Mr.B.Dhanapal, died on 28.11.2014 leaving behind his wife and children as his
legal heirs. It is also submitted that the 1st respondent died in the year 2018
leaving behind his legal representatives. Respondents 2 and 3 also died in the
years 2020 and 2021 respectively. Further, it is reported that respondents 7 and
8 also died during the pendency of this appeal. The learned counsel stated that
the 2nd appellant who is also a party could not be contacted.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.555 of 2013
2.Despite the deaths of several respondents, no steps have been taken so
far. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants expressed his inability to
contact the 2nd appellant as he believes that her address has changed.
3.Hence, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the matter, as no useful
purpose will be served by keeping this appeal pending.
4.In the result, the appeal is liable to be dismissed as abated as against 1st
appellant, respondents 1, 2, 3, 7 and 8. Since no steps are taken, the appeal is
dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
[SSSRJ] [AANJ]
23.01.2023
cda
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
A.S.No.555 of 2013
S.S.SUNDAR, J., AND A.A.NAKKIRAN, J., cda
To
1.The II Additional District Judge, Salem.
2.The Section Officer, VR Records, High Court, Chennai.
A.S.No.555 of 2013
23.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!