Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 828 Mad
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2023
Crl.OP.No.1030 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Crl.O.P.No.1030 of 2023
V.Kannan ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police (East),
Jawaharlal Nehru Street, Puducherry.
2. The Union Territory of Puducherry,
Represented by its Station House Officer,
Muthiyalpet Police Station,
Muthiyalpet, Puducherry. ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.,
to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated
17.12.2022 and file a FIR.
For Petitioner : Mr.Dr.A.Thiyagarajan (Senior Advocate)
for Mr. D.Senthil Kumar
For Respondent : Mr.V.Balamurugane
Public Prosecutor for Puducherry
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP.No.1030 of 2023
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent
to register the petitioner's complaint dated 17.12.2022 and file a FIR.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner
purchased one mandapam on 22.03.2013 from one Saroja. Relying on the
release deed dated 18.07.2016, executed by her father, Saroja claims the
property from the petitioner. Based on the complaint given by the petitioner, the
District Registrar, Puducherry, canceled the release deed as “Fraudulent
Transaction”. Thereafter, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the
respondent police on 17.12.2022, for creating forged documents. However, till
now, no action was taken. Hence, present petition is filed.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
respondent submitted that, after the receipt of complaint dated 17.12.2022 from
the petitioner, CSR enquiry is pending.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1030 of 2023
Government Advocate (crl.side) for the respondent.
5. The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge
Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after
relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court
cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene
only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases. However, taking note of the
fact that the complaint is now being enquired, the Investigation officer is
directed to issue notice to the parties and conduct enquiry as directed by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar
Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)]. If any cognizable offence is made out,
the respondent police is bound to register the FIR otherwise they may close the
complaint. Such exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1030 of 2023
of.
20.01.2023
Sma
To
1. The Superintendent of Police (East), Jawaharlal Nehru Street, Puducherry.
2. The Union Territory of Puducherry, Represented by its Station House Officer, Muthiyalpet Police Station, Muthiyalpet, Puducherry.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.1030 of 2023
Sma
Crl.O.P.No.1030 of 2023
20.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!