Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 560 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2023
W.P.No.643 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.01.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
W.P.No.643 of 2023
Marimuthu …Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Police,
Salem City.
2.State represented by Inspector of Police,
Central Crime Branch,
Salem.
3.A.Magudesan …Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent not to
interfere with the civil dispute between petitioner and the third respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Franklin
For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh (For R1 & R2)
Government Advocate (Crl side)
________
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.643 of 2023
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent not
to interfere with the civil dispute between petitioner and the third
respondent.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that
petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.9,00,000/- from the third respondent on the
basis of promissory note. Third respondent had given a complaint against
the petitioner seeking the money. The transaction between the petitioner and
third respondent is purely civil in nature. However, on the basis of the
complaint given by the third respondent, the second respondent had issued
notice to the petitioner for enquiry. Respondent Police is not entitled to
enquire a civil dispute. Thus, this petition.
3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted
that third respondent had given a complaint to the second respondent against
the petitioner alleging that petitioner had cheated third respondent. On the
basis of the complaint, C.S.R.No.28 of 2022 is pending.
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.643 of 2023
4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned
Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondents.
5.The Division Bench of this Court in G.Prabhakaran v. The
Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, reported in (2018) 2 LW Crl 489 and
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in its latest judgment rendered by a three Judge
Bench in M.Subramaniam v. S.Janaki, reported in (2020) 5 CTC 464, after
relying upon Sakiri Vasu's Case, has categorically held that the High Court
cannot issue any direction for registration of FIR. High Court can intervene
only in extraordinary circumstances and rare cases.
6.In view of the fact that enquiry is pending, it is directed that if any
cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police is bound to register
the FIR otherwise they may close the complaint. Such exercise shall be
completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
this order.
7.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.643 of 2023
10.01.2023
ep Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.J.,
ep
To
1.The Commissioner of Police, Salem City.
2.State represented by Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Salem.
2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.
W.P.No.643 of 2023
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.643 of 2023
10.01.2023
________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!