Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 489 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
S.A.No.574 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 09.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No.574 of 2008
&
M.P.No.1 of 2008
N.Sambasivam ...Appellant
Vs.
G.Lakshmanan ...Respondent
Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of
Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree made in A.S.No.167
of 2003 dtaed 30.11.2005 on the file of Additional District and
Sessions Court, Fast Track Court – IV, Chennai, confirming the
Judgement and Decree dated 29.07.2002 made in O.S.No.6820 of
1989 on the file of the VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.A.Lakshmanan
For Respondent : Died
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.A.No.574 of 2008
JUDGMENT
There is no appearance for the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. On 14.06.2021, the following orders has been passed in
C.M.P.No.5830 of 2020 in S.A.No.574 of 2008 for condoning the
delay of 960 days in filing the petition to restore the petition filed for
bringing on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole
respondent:
“ The above application is filed for condoning the delay of 960 days in filing the petition to restore the petition filed to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased 1st respondent. The application to bring on record the legal heirs was filed in M.P.SR.No.11159 of 2016 and the same was dismissed for default. It is to restore that application that the present application has been field with the delay of 960 days.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.574 of 2008
2. It is also seen that the counsel after taking out this application had not been entering appearance and the matter was listed under the caption for dismissal on 24.02.2020. At which juncture the counsel had appeared and thereafter, the matter was listed on 30.04.2020. There was no representation and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 03.06.2021. Today when the matter is listed, once again there is no representation on behalf of the counsel for the petitioner. Therefore the petition is dismissed for default.”
3. To date, this order has not been set aside and the CMP
restored. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
09.01.2023
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
kan
To
1. The Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court – IV, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.574 of 2008
2.The VII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.
P.T. ASHA, J,
kan
S.A.No.574 of 2008
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.No.574 of 2008
09.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!