Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 412 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
C.S.No.435 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
C.S.No.435 of 2017
Mr.N.Sairam
Proprietor of M/s.VVS Creations,
No.2C, IInd Floor, Nandhitha Apartments,
No.47 Thirumalai Pillai Road,
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ... Plaintiff
Vs
1.Mr.C.H.Vamsy Krishna Srinivas,
Proprietor of M/s.SVK Cinema
Flat No.101, Satya Mandir, Film Nagar,
Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad,
Telangana State,
Permanent residing at No.9-7, 40/7/2, Lakshmi Nagar,
Sivajipalem,
Visakhapatnam – 530 017.
2.Mr.Kaushal Kishore,
Proprietor of M/s.Professional Creations,
No.1-B, Dhananjay Chambers,
Yousuf Guda Main Road,
Ameerpet, Hyderbad,
Telangana State.
1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.435 of 2017
3.Mr.R.P.Bala
Proprietor of M/s.R.P.Films,
No.5/3 Kamaraj Street,
Gandhi Nagar, Saligramam,
Chennai – 600 093.
4.M/s.Real Image Technology (P) Ltd,
Rep by its Director,
No.42 Dr.Ranga Road, Mylapore,
Chennai – 600 004.
5.The President,
M/s.Film & Television Producers,
Guild of South of India,
No.B1, Rams Flat,
No.19, Jagatheswaran Street,
T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017. ... Defendants
Prayer: This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 5 of the Original Side
Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
read with Section 51 and 61 of the Copy Right Act, 1957, prayed for a
Judgment and Decree:-
a) Granting a Permanent Injunction restraining the 3rd defendant
or any one claiming under him from attempting to dub the Telugu Film
“RA RA Krishnayya” into Tamil as per the purported agreement dated
26.10.2016 of the 3rd defendant claiming to have received the rights to dub
in Tamil from the 1st defendant;
b) Granting such further or other reliefs as this Court deems fit
and
2/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.S.No.435 of 2017
c) Granting exemplary costs against the 3rd defendant who has
been attempting to infringe the copyright of the plaintiff to dub Telugu
Film in question in Tamil.
For Plaintiff : No appearance
For Defendants : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the suit was taken up for hearing on 19.12.2022, there
was no representation on behalf of the plaintiff. Hence, the suit was
directed to be listed on 03.01.2023. Again, when the suit was taken up for
hearing on 03.01.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the
plaintiff. Hence, the suit was directed to be listed on 06.01.2023. Even
today, there is no representation either on behalf of the plaintiff or on
behalf of the defendants.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.435 of 2017
2. It appears that the plaintiff is not interested in prosecuting the
case. Hence, this suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
06.01.2023
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
jas
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.No.435 of 2017
C.SARAVANAN, J.
jas
C.S.No.435 of 2017
06.01.2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!